[2020] KEHC 7822 (KLR)
The court held that the trial magistrate erred by invoking Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code to place the accused on his defence, as this section only permits acquittal if no prima facie case is established. The correct procedure, if a prima facie case is found, is to proceed under Section 211(1) of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 7822 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Philip Agere Adera; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 40 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- application allowed; impugned ruling set aside; matter remitted for proper determination
- Judges
- AC Mrima
- Legal Topics
- Fair Trial Rights, Criminal Procedure Code Interpretation, Section 210 Vs 211, Acquittal Procedure, Trial Nullity
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Agere Adera
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred by placing the accused on his defence under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code instead of acquitting him if no prima facie case was established.
- 2 Whether such an error amounts to a violation of the right to a fair trial under Article 50 of the Constitution.
- 3 Whether the error can be cured under Section 382 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the trial magistrate erred by invoking Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code to place the accused on his defence, as this section only permits acquittal if no prima facie case is established. The correct procedure, if a prima facie case is found, is to proceed under Section 211(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The error was not superficial but fundamental, as it violated the accused's right to a fair trial under Article 50 of the Constitution. Such a procedural misstep renders the trial a nullity and cannot be cured by Section 382 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned ruling and directed the trial court to review the...
Court Disposition
application allowed; impugned ruling set aside; matter remitted for proper determination
Orders
- The ruling delivered on 13/11/2019 placing the accused person on his defence under Section 210 Criminal Procedure Code is set aside and vacated.
- The court now seized of Migori Chief Magistrates Criminal Case No. 217 of 2019 Republic vs Philip Agere Adera shall review the prosecution evidence and render a ruling on whether the accused person ought to be placed on his defence, subject to compliance with Section 200 Criminal Procedure Code, if not yet.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MIGORI
[Coram: A. C. Mrima, J.]
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 40 OF 2020
PHILIP AGERE ADERA.........APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC...........................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This revision is in respect of Migori Chief Magistrates Criminal Case No. 217 of 2019 Republic vs Philip Agere Adera (hereinafter referred to as “the criminal case”).
2. The accused person in the criminal case, one Philip Agere Adera, was charged with the offence of stealing stock contrary to Section 278of the Penal Code. He denied the charge and was tried.
3. At the close of the prosecution case the trial court rendered a ruling on whether the prosecution had established a prima-facie case so as for the accused person be placed on his defence. That was on 13/11/2019.
4. In a brief ruling the court delivered itself as follows: -
14. There is only one option available to a trial court under Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code. It is to dismiss the case and acquit the accused person. A trial court cannot therefore place an accused person on his/her defence under Section 210 Criminal Procedure Code. That is the preserve of Section 211(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
15. The error is therefore not a superficial one. It runs through to the heart of a fair trial. A court invoking Section 210 of the Criminal Procedure Code and failing to acquit an accused person occasions a failure of justice. Article 50of the Constitution guarantees the right to a fair trial. The right to a fair trial includes the right of an accused person to be tried within the confines of the law. Placing an accused person on his defence under a wrong provisions of the law therefore contravenes the right to a fair trial and renders the trial a nullity. It is an error which cannot be cured under Section 382 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
16. The Accused person in the criminal case was yet to be present his defence.
17. In the circumstances, in order to uphold the rule of law and ensure a fair trial is rendered to the parties the following orders do issue: -
a) The ruling delivered on 13/11/2019 placing the accused person on his defence under Section 210 Criminal Procedure Code be and is hereby set-aside and vacated;
b) The court now seized of theMigori Chief Magistrates Criminal Case No. 217 of 2019 Republic vs Philip Agere Adera shall proceed to review the prosecution evidence and render a ruling on whether the accused person ought to be placed on his defence, subject to compliance with Section 200 Criminal Procedure Code, if not yet. For avoidance of doubt, this ruling shall not sanction the re-opening of the prosecution’s case.
Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATEDandSIGNED at MIGORI this 25th day of February, 2020
A. C. MRIMA
JUDGE