[2004] KEHC 2276 (KLR)
The court held that the omission of the decree from the record of appeal is a fatal defect that renders the appeal incompetent. The relevant rules require that the record of appeal must contain the judgment, order, or decree appealed from, and the court has no discretion to dispense with these documents. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 2276 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Philip Etyang Ounoi; Respondent: Leonard Wandera
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 23 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out as incompetent due to omission of decree in record of appeal.
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Record Requirements, Defamation Damages, Preliminary Objection, Competency of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Etyang Ounoi
Appellant
Leonard Wandera
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to include the decree in the record of appeal renders the appeal fatally defective and incompetent.
- 2 Whether the preliminary objection on the competency of the appeal can be raised at the stage of submissions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the omission of the decree from the record of appeal is a fatal defect that renders the appeal incompetent. The relevant rules require that the record of appeal must contain the judgment, order, or decree appealed from, and the court has no discretion to dispense with these documents. The preliminary objection raised by the respondent was therefore upheld, and the appeal was struck out with costs to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out as incompetent due to omission of decree in record of appeal.
Orders
- The preliminary objection is upheld.
- The appeal is struck out with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2002
(From Busia SRM CC No. 169 of 2001 before B. Maloba SRM)
PHILIP ETYANG OUNOI ……………. APPELLANT
VS
LEONARD WANDERA …………….. RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
The Respondent sued the Appellant for defamation before the Senior Resident Magistrate’s court, Busia. Judgment was entered in his favour in the sum of Ksh.40,000/= being general damages for defamation. Being dissatisfied the appellant challenged the aforesaid decision in this appeal and put forward four grounds in his memorandum of appeal.
The appeal came up for hearing and the appellant condensed his four grounds of appeal to two grounds. The Respondent put up a spirited fight against the appeal. The Respondent raised a preliminary point at the closing stages of his submissions. Mr. Ashioya who appeared for the Respondent claimed that the appeal was fatally defective because the decree appealed against was not extracted and attached to record of appeal. I think this is a very crucial point which must be disposed of first before considering the substance of the appeal. The Respondent’s learned advocate is of the view that the failure to include the decree on the record of appeal rendered the whole appeal fatally defective and incompetent.
Mr. Omondi who appeared for the appellant conceded that he did not include in his record the decree, however he was of the view that the Respondent should have raised the issue at the stage of taking directions. He sought to shield himself behind the provisions of Order XLI rule 8 B (2) of the Civil Procedure rules which states that party should take up objections on jurisdiction of the appellate before directions are taken. With great respect to the appellant’s learned advocate the matter at hand relate to the competency of the appeal and not the jurisdiction of the court. Consequently the Respondent has jurisdiction to raise the objection. In fact Order XLI rule 8 B (4) of the Civil Procedure rules enjoins this court to be satisfied that all the documents specified in sub rule (4) of rule 8 (B) are on record before having the appeal heard. The sub rule clearly states that the record of appeal should contain the Judgment, Order or decree appealed from. The court’s discretion to dispense with the production of any of the documents specified is restricted to all other documents save for the memorandum of appeal, the pleadings, Judgment, Order or decree. In short without the production of the above documents the appeal is rendered incompetent. A decree has been described as the formal expression of an adjudication. It is clear that there has been no legal representation of the memorandum of appeal at all in the absence of the decree.
The upshot therefore is that the preliminary objection raised by the Respondent must succeed. It is upheld. Consequently this appeal is ordered struck out with costs to the Respondent.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 9th DAY OF July 2004
J.K. SERGON
JUDGE