[2007] KEHC 371 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 371 (KLR)

The court found that the appellants had failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal since filing the memorandum of appeal, including not filing the record of appeal or seeking admission for hearing. Given the unexplained delay and the respondent's application, the court exercised its discretion to admit the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 371 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Rev. Philip Kakvoji Andove; Appellant: Executive Officer P.A.G. Church of Kenya; Respondent: Rev. Tom Lidweye; Respondent: Samwel Ongeri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 84 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Security for Costs and Directions
Outcome
Application allowed with directions and conditions imposed on the appellants.
Judges
K Bauni
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Appeal Admission, Record of Appeal Filing, Dismissal for Non Prosecution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Security for Costs Appeal Admission Record of Appeal Filing Dismissal for Non Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rev. Philip Kakvoji Andove

Appellant

Executive Officer P.A.G. Church of Kenya

Appellant

Rev. Tom Lidweye

Respondent

Samwel Ongeri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Security for Costs and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the appellants should be ordered to provide security for costs of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to delay in filing the record of appeal.
  3. 3 Whether directions should be given regarding the prosecution of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellants had failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal since filing the memorandum of appeal, including not filing the record of appeal or seeking admission for hearing. Given the unexplained delay and the respondent's application, the court exercised its discretion to admit the appeal for hearing but imposed strict timelines for the appellants to file the record of appeal and prosecute the matter. The court further ordered the appellants to deposit KES 30,000 as security for costs within 30 days. Failure to comply with any of these orders would result in automatic dismissal of the appeal with costs to the respondent. The court's decision was grounded in...

Court Disposition

Application allowed with directions and conditions imposed on the appellants.

Orders

  • Appeal admitted for hearing.
  • Appellants to prepare and file record of appeal within 30 days.