[2013] KEHC 1778 (KLR)
The High Court found that while the prevalence of the offence in the area could justify a deterrent sentence, the sentence of seven years imprisonment was manifestly excessive in light of the appellant's plea of guilty, status as a first offender, the value of the sheep, and the fact that the carcass was returned to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1778 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Philip Kiprop Komen; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 110 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Judges
- K Kimondo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Plea of Guilty, Deterrent Sentencing, First Offender, Excessive Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Kiprop Komen
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of seven years imprisonment for killing an animal with intent to steal was manifestly excessive.
- 2 Whether the trial court properly considered the appellant's plea of guilty and status as a first offender in sentencing.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that while the prevalence of the offence in the area could justify a deterrent sentence, the sentence of seven years imprisonment was manifestly excessive in light of the appellant's plea of guilty, status as a first offender, the value of the sheep, and the fact that the carcass was returned to the complainant. The court held that sentencing must be individualized and proportionate to the circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced to the period already served, and the appellant was ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment is set aside.
- The sentence is reduced to the period already served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.110 OF 2012
PHILIP KIPROP KOMEN……………………. APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………….…..….RESPONDENT
(BEING ANAPPEAL FROM THE ORIGINAL CONVICTION AND SENTENCE IN CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1783OF 2011 REPUBLIC VS PHILIP KIPROP KOMEN IN THE RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT AT ELDORET BY D.K. KEMEI,PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE DATED 27TH MAY 2011)
JUDGMENT
The appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilty for killing an animal with intent to steal contrary to section 289 of the Penal Code.The offence was committed on 19th May 2011 at Chororget village, Keiyo South District. The facts read in court were straightforward: The complainant was herding six sheep on the road side. Later in the day, her son went to take the sheep to water. He found one missing. A search was mounted. The missing sheep was found; it was dead. It had a deep cut on the neck. Photographs of the sheep were taken. The carcass was then released to the complainant. The appellant was suspected to have committed the offence. He was arrested and arraigned in court. The value of the sheep was Kshs 2,000.
When those facts were read to the appellant, he confirmed them to be true. He was a first offender.In mitigation, he asked to be pardoned as his family would suffer. The learned trial Magistrate found that offences of that nature were prevalent in the area; which called for a deterrent sentence. He sentenced the appellant to jail for seven years.
The appellant was aggrieved by his conviction and sentence. He lodged an appeal to the High Court. There are five grounds of appeal filedon 11th April 2011. In a synopsis, the appellant’s case is that the sentence was manifestly excessive. At the hearing of the appeal, the appellant’s learned Counsel, Ms. Isiaho, quite rightly, limited her appeal to the sentence. The appeal is contested by the State.
This is a first appeal to the High Court. I have re-evaluated all the evidence on record and drawn my own conclusions. See Njoroge v Republic [1987] KLR 99, Okeno v Republic [1972] EA 32, KariukiKaranja v Republic [1986] KLR 190.
The appellant’s plea of guilty was unequivocal. From the charge sheet and the facts, the sheep was valued at Kshs 2,000. The carcass was returned to the complainant. The appellant was a first offender and pleaded for leniency. True, the learned trial Magistrate considered the prevalence of the offence. That may have called for a deterrent sentence. But considering all the circumstances of the case, the sentence of seven years was too punitive. See Orwochi v Republic [1976-80] 1 KLR 1638 and Marando v Republic [1976-80] 1 KLR 1639 where sentences of four years for manslaughter were held to be manifestly excessive. I think the principle to be distilled from these cases is that sentencing must take into account the unique circumstances of each case.
For all of those reasons this appeal is allowed. The sentence passed against the appellant is set aside. The appellant has been in custody for nearly two and a half years. The sentence is reduced to the period already served. The appellant shall be set free forthwith unless held for some other lawful cause.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at ELDORET this 25th day of October 2013
G.K. KIMONDO
JUDGE
Judgment read in open court in the presence of
Ms…………………………………………………for the appellant.
Mr……………………………….………………..….…for the State.
Mr. P. Ekitela, Court Clerk.