[2017] KEHC 2445 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2445 (KLR)

The court found that the previous orders required correction to accurately reflect the agreement of the parties and to ensure that the petitioner was expressly included as a party entitled to access the requested election information. The court also determined that the description of the documents to be supplied and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 2445 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Philip Kyalo Kituti Kaloki; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Returning Officer, Kibwezi East Constituency; Respondent: Jessica Nduku Kiko Mbalu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Makueni
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 1 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Interlocutory Order
Outcome
orders corrected and clarified as agreed by parties
Judges
CM Kariuki
Legal Topics
Access to Election Information, Election Procedure, Correction of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Constitutional Law Access to Election Information Election Procedure Correction of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Philip Kyalo Kituti Kaloki

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Returning Officer, Kibwezi East Constituency

Respondent

Jessica Nduku Kiko Mbalu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Interlocutory Order

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner should be expressly included as a party entitled to access election information as per previous court orders.
  2. 2 Whether the wording of the orders regarding supply of polling day diaries and implementation period required correction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the previous orders required correction to accurately reflect the agreement of the parties and to ensure that the petitioner was expressly included as a party entitled to access the requested election information. The court also determined that the description of the documents to be supplied and the period for compliance needed clarification. Accordingly, the orders were amended to include the petitioner, to specify that copies of polling day diaries were to be supplied, and to set the implementation period at 21 days. These corrections were necessary to ensure clarity, fairness, and effective implementation of the court's directions in the election petition.

Court Disposition

orders corrected and clarified as agreed by parties

Orders

  • Orders (b), (c), (d), and (e) amended to include the petitioner as a party to be supplied and/or access the information sought.
  • Prayer (d) corrected to read 'copies of polling day diaries'.