[2005] KEHC 2668 (KLR)
The court exercised its discretion to allow payment of the decretal sum by instalments, taking into account the non-commercial nature of the debt, the circumstances of the accident, and the applicant's financial hardship. The court found that while hardship alone is not sufficient, the bona fides of the debtor and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 2668 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Philip Ng'ang'a Kamombo (K); Defendant: Supreme Service Station; Defendant: Eunice Kamotho; Objector: Honorable Joseph Kamotho
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 1934 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Instalments
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Decretal Sum Payment, Instalment Orders, Road Accident Liability, Estate Claims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Ng'ang'a Kamombo (K)
Plaintiff
Supreme Service Station
Defendant
Eunice Kamotho
Defendant
Honorable Joseph Kamotho
Objector
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Instalments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be allowed to settle the decretal sum by monthly instalments.
- 2 What constitutes sufficient grounds for granting payment by instalments under the court's discretion.
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to allow payment of the decretal sum by instalments, taking into account the non-commercial nature of the debt, the circumstances of the accident, and the applicant's financial hardship. The court found that while hardship alone is not sufficient, the bona fides of the debtor and the context of the claim (arising from a fatal road accident involving the applicant's employee) justified indulgence. The court increased the proposed monthly instalment from KES 30,000 to KES 50,000 to balance the interests of both parties, ensuring the creditor is not unreasonably prejudiced while allowing the debtor reasonable terms for payment.
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- The applicant is allowed to remit KES 50,000 monthly until payment in full of the decretal sum.
- Costs of this application to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.1934 OF 1998
PHILIP NG’ANG’A KAMOMBO (K)…………..……..…..PLAINTIFF VERSUS SUPREME SERVICE STATION…………………....1ST DEFENDANT EUNICE KAMOTHO…………………………….……2ND DEFENDANT HONORABLE JOSEPH KAMOTHO…………………..…..OBJECTOR
RULING
The plaintiff’S motor vehicle registration No. KAG 423R Toyota Pick Up was involved in a motor road accident. On 25th December 1996 along Muranga Kiriaini Road one PHILLIP NG’ANG’A who was a passenger in the said motor vehicle sustained serious injuries which culminated into his death. The plaintiff filed a suit against the applicant seeking damages. The suit was filed on behalf of the estate of the deceased.
The court awarded Shs.1,417,578. 95 all inclusive.
On 25th February 2005 the applicant (Judgment Debtor) applied to be allowed to settle the decretal sum by monthly instalments of Sh.30,000/=. A sum of Sh.300,000/= has already been paid. The motor vehicle was being driven by one Mutinda Mwengi Kiilu an employee of the applicant who also died in the said accident. On an application for orders to settle a decretal sum by instalments, the court must consider each case on its own merit. The applicant submits that she is hard pressed and unable to settle the whole amount at once but that is not sufficient reason. Mr. Onyango submits that the applicant has not shown bone fides by arranging prompt payment of a fair proportion of the debt.
The Sh.300,000/= paid was by order of the court.
But as I have said earlier each case has to be decided on its own merits, the predominating factor being of course the bone fides of the debtor. In the case of KESHAVJI JETHABHAI & BROTHERS LTD VS. SALEH ABDALLA 1959 EA 260 the court held that hardship to a debtor might in some circumstances be taken into consideration on an application for payment by instalments; it is a question in each case whether some indulgence can fairly be given to the debtor without unreasonably prejudicing the creditor.
In the present case it is not a commercial debt. The claim arises out of a road accident and the deceased was traveling in the motor vehicle of the applicant which was being driven by her servant. These are circumstances which attract the courts discretionary powers in favour of the applicant. She has asked to be allowed to pay Shs.30,000/= monthly instalments. But I would raise the amount to Shs.50,000/=
Accordingly the applicant’s application is allowed and I order that the applicant be allowed to remit Sh.50,000/= monthly until payment in full. Costs of this application to the respondent. Those are the orders of this court.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 21st April 2005.
J.L.A. OSIEMO
JUDGE