[2019] KEHC 6905 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 6905 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had made diligent efforts to obtain the trial court record and that the delay in filing the appeal was not attributable to him but to the trial court's failure to provide the necessary documents. The prosecution did not demonstrate any prejudice that would result from granting the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 6905 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Philip Oyier Kwasu; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 12 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Right of Appeal, Criminal Appeals
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Right of Appeal Criminal Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Philip Oyier Kwasu

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was occasioned by the applicant or by the trial court's failure to provide proceedings and judgment.
  3. 3 Whether granting leave to appeal out of time would prejudice the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had made diligent efforts to obtain the trial court record and that the delay in filing the appeal was not attributable to him but to the trial court's failure to provide the necessary documents. The prosecution did not demonstrate any prejudice that would result from granting the extension. Therefore, in the interests of justice and to safeguard the applicant's right of appeal, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application and grant leave to file the appeal out of time.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file his appeal out of time challenging the proceedings, judgment, conviction and sentence in Siaya PM’s Court Cr. Case No. 1129/2016.
  • The intended appeal shall be filed and served within 7 days of the date of this ruling.