[2013] KEHC 2072 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 2072 (KLR)

The court found that the facts and legal issues raised in the petitioners' Notice of Motion dated 14th December 2012 were identical to those in Malindi Land Case Number 168 of 2012. The court, having already ruled on the same issues in the related case, allowed the petitioners' application as prayed. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 2072 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Philip Subili Righo & 8 Others; Respondent: Michael Seth Kaseme; Respondent: Hassan Barisa Kalime; Respondent: Samuel Kingi Mwangi; Respondent: County Council of Tana River
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 18 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Outcome
Application allowed as prayed.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Right to Property, Equality and Non Discrimination, Public Land Management, Administrative Action
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Right to Property Equality and Non Discrimination Public Land Management Administrative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Philip Subili Righo & 8 Others

Applicant

Michael Seth Kaseme

Respondent

Hassan Barisa Kalime

Respondent

Samuel Kingi Mwangi

Respondent

County Council of Tana River

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the respondents contravened the petitioners' fundamental rights under Articles 27, 40, 47, 60, and 63 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioners are entitled to the reliefs sought in the Notice of Motion dated 14th December 2012.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the facts and legal issues raised in the petitioners' Notice of Motion dated 14th December 2012 were identical to those in Malindi Land Case Number 168 of 2012. The court, having already ruled on the same issues in the related case, allowed the petitioners' application as prayed. The court further advised the parties to consider consolidating the two suits for efficient determination, given the overlap in facts and law.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as prayed.

Orders

  • The Petitioners' Notice of Motion dated 14th December 2012 is allowed as prayed.
  • Parties should consider consolidating this Petition with Malindi Land Case Number 168 of 2012 and take directions accordingly.