[2013] KEHC 6231 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6231 (KLR)

The court found that the issues raised by the petitioners related to the internal constitution of the party list, which falls within the exclusive domain of the political party, provided the process complies with the law. The court agreed with the Committee's finding that the law was not breached in the party...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 6231 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Philister Auma Meso; Applicant: Mwandaro Grace Mboja; Respondent: The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 315 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Party List Nominations, County Assembly Seats, Constitutional Compliance, Political Party Disputes
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Election Petitions Party List Nominations County Assembly Seats Constitutional Compliance Political Party Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Philister Auma Meso

Applicant

Mwandaro Grace Mboja

Applicant

The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's published list of nominees to the Kilifi County Assembly violated Articles 10, 90, and 177 of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the original list confirmed by the ODM party should be deemed the proper list of nominees.
  3. 3 Whether the court should compel the respondent to adhere to the original ODM list.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues raised by the petitioners related to the internal constitution of the party list, which falls within the exclusive domain of the political party, provided the process complies with the law. The court agreed with the Committee's finding that the law was not breached in the party nomination process. There was no evidence of a constitutional breach or violation of the petitioners' rights in the nomination process. Additionally, the petitioners failed to join the nominee whose inclusion they challenged as a party to the proceedings. Consequently, the court found no basis to interfere with the respondent's published list and dismissed the petition.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The petition is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.