[2021] KEELC 4101 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 4101 (KLR)

The court adopted the consent of the parties, which provided for conservatory orders prohibiting any activities that may damage or cause waste on the suit properties. The application for a temporary injunction was thus compromised by consent, and the court did not make a contested determination on the merits of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 4101 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Phineas Ngaku Murungi; Plaintiff: Edwin Kaburu Thuura; Plaintiff: Kamundi Thuura; Plaintiff: Kithinji Barine; Plaintiff: Ashford Mutegi Murungi; Plaintiff: Jasper Kiria; Plaintiff: Ephantus Kinyua Kiria; Defendant: Riungu Kaminchi; Defendant: M’Murungi Kunganai; Defendant: Kinyua Kagogi; Defendant: Kawira M’Ndaka; Defendant: Murithi Bururia; Defendant: Kithinji Bururia; Defendant: Kirama Chabari; Defendant: Virginia Murithi; Defendant: Damaris Mukwandegi; Defendant: Kariuki Bururia; Defendant: Catherine Mukwamugo; Defendant: Michael Ndubi; Defendant: District Lands Adjudication Officer, Maara Sub County; Defendant: District Surveyor, Meru South/Maara Sub County; Defendant: Lands Registrar, Meru South
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E002 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application (injunction) and Adoption of Consent
Outcome
Application compromised by consent; conservatory orders issued; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Ancestral Land Rights, Land Adjudication, Property Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Ancestral Land Rights Land Adjudication Property Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phineas Ngaku Murungi

Plaintiff

Edwin Kaburu Thuura

Plaintiff

Kamundi Thuura

Plaintiff

Kithinji Barine

Plaintiff

Ashford Mutegi Murungi

Plaintiff

Jasper Kiria

Plaintiff

Ephantus Kinyua Kiria

Plaintiff

Riungu Kaminchi

Defendant

M’Murungi Kunganai

Defendant

Kinyua Kagogi

Defendant

Kawira M’Ndaka

Defendant

Murithi Bururia

Defendant

Kithinji Bururia

Defendant

Kirama Chabari

Defendant

Virginia Murithi

Defendant

Damaris Mukwandegi

Defendant

Kariuki Bururia

Defendant

Catherine Mukwamugo

Defendant

Michael Ndubi

Defendant

District Lands Adjudication Officer, Maara Sub County

Defendant

District Surveyor, Meru South/Maara Sub County

Defendant

Lands Registrar, Meru South

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application (injunction) and Adoption of Consent

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with the suit properties pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case with a probability of success regarding ownership and occupation of the suit properties.
  3. 3 Whether the actions of the defendants amount to unlawful interference with the plaintiffs' property rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the consent of the parties, which provided for conservatory orders prohibiting any activities that may damage or cause waste on the suit properties. The application for a temporary injunction was thus compromised by consent, and the court did not make a contested determination on the merits of the application. The effect is that the status quo is preserved pending the hearing and determination of the main suit, with costs to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application compromised by consent; conservatory orders issued; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Conservatory orders issued prohibiting any activities that may damage or cause waste on the suit properties.
  • The application dated 8.2.2021 is compromised upon the above terms.