[2021] KEELC 2883 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2883 (KLR)

The court adopted the consent executed by the parties' advocates as its order, finding that the parties had mutually agreed to resolve the dispute regarding the occupation and boundaries of the suit parcels through a survey process. The consent was properly executed, and the terms were clear: the County Surveyor...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 2883 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Phineas Ngaku Murungi; Plaintiff: Edwin Kaburu Thuura; Plaintiff: Kamunid Thuura; Plaintiff: Kithinji Barine; Plaintiff: Ashford Mutegi Murungi; Plaintiff: Jasper Kiria; Plaintiff: Ephantus Kinyua Kiria; Defendant: Riungu Kaminchi; Defendant: M’Murungi Kungania; Defendant: Kinyua Kagogi; Defendant: Kawira M’Ndaka; Defendant: Murithi Bururia; Defendant: Kithinji Bururia; Defendant: Kirama Chabari; Defendant: Virginia Murithi; Defendant: Damaris Mukwandegi; Defendant: Kariuki Bururia; Defendant: Catherine Mukwamugo; Defendant: Michael Ndubi; Defendant: District Lands Adjudication Officer Maara Sub County; Defendant: District Surveyor Meru South/Maara Sub County; Defendant: Lands Registrar, Meru South
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E002 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Land and Environment Case / Consent Order
Outcome
Consent adopted as order of the court; directions to follow after survey report.
Legal Topics
Land Adjudication, Boundary Disputes, Survey Reports
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Adjudication Boundary Disputes Survey Reports

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phineas Ngaku Murungi

Plaintiff

Edwin Kaburu Thuura

Plaintiff

Kamunid Thuura

Plaintiff

Kithinji Barine

Plaintiff

Ashford Mutegi Murungi

Plaintiff

Jasper Kiria

Plaintiff

Ephantus Kinyua Kiria

Plaintiff

Riungu Kaminchi

Defendant

M’Murungi Kungania

Defendant

Kinyua Kagogi

Defendant

Kawira M’Ndaka

Defendant

Murithi Bururia

Defendant

Kithinji Bururia

Defendant

Kirama Chabari

Defendant

Virginia Murithi

Defendant

Damaris Mukwandegi

Defendant

Kariuki Bururia

Defendant

Catherine Mukwamugo

Defendant

Michael Ndubi

Defendant

District Lands Adjudication Officer Maara Sub County

Defendant

District Surveyor Meru South/Maara Sub County

Defendant

Lands Registrar, Meru South

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Environment Case / Consent Order

  1. 1 Whether the parties can resolve the dispute regarding occupation and boundaries of the suit parcels by consent.
  2. 2 Whether the County Surveyor should be directed to ascertain actual occupation, acreage, and boundaries of the disputed parcels.
  3. 3 How the costs of the survey exercise should be apportioned among the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the consent executed by the parties' advocates as its order, finding that the parties had mutually agreed to resolve the dispute regarding the occupation and boundaries of the suit parcels through a survey process. The consent was properly executed, and the terms were clear: the County Surveyor would visit the disputed parcels, establish actual occupation, acreage, and boundaries, and file a report within 90 days. The costs of the survey would be borne by the parties, excluding the 13th, 14th, and 15th defendants. The court found no legal impediment to adopting the consent as an order, as all parties were represented and the agreement was lawful. The matter was set for...

Court Disposition

Consent adopted as order of the court; directions to follow after survey report.

Orders

  • The consent dated 15th June, 2021 is adopted as an order of the court.
  • The County Surveyor, Tharaka Nithi, shall visit the disputed parcels and carry out the survey as agreed.