[2017] KEHC 9749 (KLR)
The court found that while most of the shares were acquired before marriage, a portion was acquired during the marriage and their value increased during the union. The applicant, though not employed, contributed through domestic work and companionship, which is recognized as contribution under the Matrimonial...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 9749 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: P.H.S; Respondent: S.M.R
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 7 December 2017
- Case Number
- Family Appeal 11 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the applicant
- Judges
- AO Muchelule, REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Property, Division of Property, Contribution to Property, Trusts in Marriage
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P.H.S
Applicant
S.M.R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a share of the respondent's shares acquired during marriage as matrimonial property.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to the return or value of gold gifted to her at the wedding and allegedly retained by the respondent.
- 3 What proportion of the shares and gold, if any, constitute matrimonial property subject to division.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while most of the shares were acquired before marriage, a portion was acquired during the marriage and their value increased during the union. The applicant, though not employed, contributed through domestic work and companionship, which is recognized as contribution under the Matrimonial Property Act. The court estimated that shares worth Kshs.3,000,000 constituted matrimonial property and awarded the applicant 30% of this value, amounting to Kshs.1,000,000. Regarding the gold, the court found it was specifically gifted to the applicant for her use and that the respondent had taken gold worth Kshs.3,037,920, to which the applicant was entitled. The total judgment sum...
Court Disposition
judgment for the applicant
Orders
- Judgment entered for the applicant in the sum of Kshs.4,037,920 together with interest at court rates from the date of judgment until full payment.
- The respondent shall pay the costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment