[2019] KEHC 8693 (KLR)
The High Court determined that, pursuant to Article 162(2) and Article 165(5) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, as well as the Environment and Land Court Act, jurisdiction over disputes concerning the environment, use, occupation, and title to land is vested exclusively in the Environment and Land Court. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 8693 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Phylce Ayoti; Respondent: Samson Opicha
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 44 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
- Outcome
- Appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court at Kakamega for disposal.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of High Court, Environment and Land Court, Land Ownership Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phylce Ayoti
Appellant
Samson Opicha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction and Transfer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to ownership, use, and occupation of land after the promulgation of the Constitution 2010 and the enactment of the Environment and Land Court Act.
- 2 Whether the present appeal should be transferred to the Environment and Land Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court determined that, pursuant to Article 162(2) and Article 165(5) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, as well as the Environment and Land Court Act, jurisdiction over disputes concerning the environment, use, occupation, and title to land is vested exclusively in the Environment and Land Court. The dispute in question, being about ownership and sharing of land, falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court. Consequently, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and must transfer the matter to the appropriate court for determination.
Court Disposition
Appeal transferred to the Environment and Land Court at Kakamega for disposal.
Orders
- The appeal is transferred to the Environment and Land Court at Kakamega for disposal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2007
PHYLICE AYOTI..............................APPELLANT
VERSUS
SAMSON OPICHA..........................RESPONDENT
(An appeal arising from the decision of the Provincial Land Disputes Tribunal, in Kakamega Case No. 30 of 2005)
RULING
1. The Constitution 2010, at Article 162(2), establishes a special court to handle disputes that revolve around the environment and the use and occupation of and title to land. Article 165(5) of the same Constitution strips the High Court of jurisdiction over such matters.
2. For avoidance of doubt, Article 162(2) states as follows: –
‘Parliament shall establish courts with the status of the High Court to hear and determine disputes relating to –
(a) employment and labour relations; and
(b) the environment and the use and occupation of, and title to, land.’
3. On the other hand, Article 165(5) of the Constitution states as follows: -
‘The High Court shall not have jurisdiction in respect of matters-
(a) reserved for the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under this Constitution; or
(b) falling within the jurisdiction of the courts contemplated in Article 162(2).’
4. In obedience to Article 162(2) of the Constitution, Parliament did, through the Environment and Land Court Act, No. 19 of 2011, establish such a court, known as the Environment and Land Court. The jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court is set out in section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. The said court has exclusive original and appellate jurisdiction to hear and determine all disputes referred to it in accordance with Article 162(2) of the Constitution, relating to environment and land.
5. According to the record of appeal, the dispute before the tribunal revolved around ownership of a property known as E/W/Malaha/166. In the end the tribunal directed how the land was to be shared out between the two disputants. On appeal the Provincial Appeals Committee upheld the verdict of the Land Disputes Tribunal. That decision was subsequently made an order of the court. The said proceedings had been conducted under the provisions of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act, Cap 303A, Laws of Kenya, which has since been repealed.
6. The High Court no longer has jurisdiction over matters revolving around ownership of or title to and occupation and use of land. That jurisdiction lies with the Environment and Land Court. I shall accordingly order that the appeal herein be transferred to the Environment and Land Court at Kakamega for disposal. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at KAKAMEGA this 10th DAY OF April, 2019
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE