[2014] KEHC 3285 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 3285 (KLR)

The court found that there was no evidence that the chamber summons dated 24th May, 2013 had been served on the advocate for the 1st objector, Terry Nzilani Ibrahim. The only affidavit of service on record referred to a mention notice, not the substantive application. As a result, the 1st objector and her advocate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 3285 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Pia Miriam Stein Ostertag; Respondent: Terry Nzilani Ibrahim; Respondent: Gerda Ostertag
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 410 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Chamber Summons Seeking Removal of Respondent and Related Orders
Outcome
Application struck out for want of service; costs to 1st and 2nd objectors; objection to grant of letters of administration to be heard expeditiously.
Judges
JV Juma
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Removal of Beneficiary, Service of Process, Customary Law Marriage
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Succession of Estates Removal of Beneficiary Service of Process Customary Law Marriage

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pia Miriam Stein Ostertag

Applicant

Terry Nzilani Ibrahim

Respondent

Gerda Ostertag

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Chamber Summons Seeking Removal of Respondent and Related Orders

  1. 1 Whether the application to remove Terry Nzilani Ibrahim from the proceedings was properly served.
  2. 2 Whether the interests of Terry Nzilani Ibrahim in the estate were extinguished by reason of remarriage.
  3. 3 Whether the court should vary previous orders regarding participation of Terry Nzilani Ibrahim's advocate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no evidence that the chamber summons dated 24th May, 2013 had been served on the advocate for the 1st objector, Terry Nzilani Ibrahim. The only affidavit of service on record referred to a mention notice, not the substantive application. As a result, the 1st objector and her advocate could not be expected to respond to an application of which they had not been served. This lack of service was prejudicial to the 1st objector and violated the principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court struck out the chamber summons for want of service, with costs to the 1st and 2nd objectors. The court further directed that the pending objection to the grant of...

Court Disposition

Application struck out for want of service; costs to 1st and 2nd objectors; objection to grant of letters of administration to be heard expeditiously.

Orders

  • The chamber summons dated 24th May, 2013 is struck out for want of service.
  • Costs of the application awarded to the 1st and 2nd objectors.