[2023] KEMC 232 (KLR)

PNN v JGG (Divorce Cause E004 of 2023) [2023] KEMC 232 (KLR) (7 August 2023) (Judgment)

Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 232 (KLR)

Republic of Kenya

In the Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts

Divorce Cause E004 of 2023

JP Aduke, SRM

August 7, 2023

Between

PNN

Petitioner

and

JGG

Respondent

Judgment

1The Petitioner filed the petition dated 20th December 2022 seeking a divorce on the grounds of mistrust and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Return of service on record shows that the respondent was served with the petition and annexures thereto. The respondent neither entered appearance nor filed a response. The petitioner filed an application seeking to have the petition proceed undefended. Return of service on record shows the petitioner served the respondent with the said application. These proceedings proceeded undefended.

2The brief facts of the case are as contained in the petition on record. In summary, PNN and JGG solemnized their marriage on 18th July 2009 in Kenya. They have one issue together from the union as at the date of writing this judgment. Both the Petitioner and respondent are domiciled in Kenya. The parties have no intentions of salvaging this marriage. The particulars of the grounds for divorce are outlined in the petition as follows:1. Irretrievable breakdown of the marriage;2. Mistrust;

3At the hearing thereof, the petitioner relied on the petition and verifying affidavit on record as evidence in support of the petition for divorce. Notably, the petitioner averred that the contents of the petition remained true as at the date of the hearing. He prayed for an order of dissolution of the marriage.

4The issue for determination before this court is whether or not the marriage between the parties merits an order of divorce under The Marriage Act, 2014 (hereafter, the Act).

5The applicable law is s.65 of the Act (on dissolution of Christian marriages) which provides that the court may grant separation or divorce on the following grounds:1. adultery by the other spouse;2. cruelty by the other spouse;3. exceptional depravity by the other spouse;4. desertion by the other spouse for at least 3 years;5. the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.

6I have considered the particulars of the grounds outlined in the petition and how those have contributed to the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as contemplated under s.65 of the Act. I have also noted the length of physical separation of the couple herein and relied on the reasoning of the court in JSM vs ENB[2015]. With respect to intention to salvage the union, I have noted the unequivocal terms of para 11 of the Petition on lack of such intention. The reasoning of the court in ROK v MJB and TPH v NVS 2017 eklr cannot be emphasized enough-“marriage is a voluntary union……this court cannot by any means order or compel the parties to remain married when the petitioner has categorically stated that she wants the same dissolved…”

7Seeing as this court cannot force two adults to live together when there is no more love between them, I allow the petition dated 20th December 2022 before me on the following terms:1. the marriage between the two be and is hereby dissolved.2. Decree nisi do issue to be made absolute in 30 days.3. This being a family matter, each party to bear own costs.

ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATEJUDGEMENT DATED AND SIGNED THIS 07TH AUGUST 2023. In the presence of:1. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe2. Counsel for the Petitioner- N/A3. Counsel for the Respondent: N/A