[2021] KEELC 3252 (KLR)
The court found that the 4th Defendant, having been registered as proprietor of the disputed land parcel Kajiado/Kaputiei South/888 by virtue of succession proceedings, is a necessary party for the effectual and complete adjudication of the dispute. The court held that even if there is no direct cause of action...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 3252 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Poka Group Ranch Community Based Organization; Plaintiff: Poka Group Ranch; Plaintiff: Jeremiah Lemako; Plaintiff: Harrison Tago; Defendant: County Government of Kajiado; Defendant: David Ole Sankori; Defendant: Gikena Investment Limited; Defendant: Esther Ndaru Mukuria (Sued on her own behalf and on behalf of the estate of Walter Bernard Mukundi Mukuria – Deceased); Defendant: Samuel Mwangi; Defendant: Bouyancy Holdings Ltd; Defendant: Land Registrar (Kajiado); Defendant: The Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2021
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 31 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Strike Out 4th Defendant
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Necessary Parties, Land Ownership Disputes, Succession and Administration, Striking Out Parties
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Poka Group Ranch Community Based Organization
Plaintiff
Poka Group Ranch
Plaintiff
Jeremiah Lemako
Plaintiff
Harrison Tago
Plaintiff
County Government of Kajiado
Defendant
David Ole Sankori
Defendant
Gikena Investment Limited
Defendant
Esther Ndaru Mukuria (Sued on her own behalf and on behalf of the estate of Walter Bernard Mukundi Mukuria – Deceased)
Defendant
Samuel Mwangi
Defendant
Bouyancy Holdings Ltd
Defendant
Land Registrar (Kajiado)
Defendant
The Hon. Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Strike Out 4th Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 4th Defendant should be struck out from the proceedings in her personal capacity and as administratrix of the estate of the late Walter Bernard Mukundi Mukuria.
- 2 Whether the 4th Defendant is a necessary party for the effectual and complete adjudication of the dispute concerning land parcel Kajiado/Kaputiei South/888.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 4th Defendant, having been registered as proprietor of the disputed land parcel Kajiado/Kaputiei South/888 by virtue of succession proceedings, is a necessary party for the effectual and complete adjudication of the dispute. The court held that even if there is no direct cause of action against her, her presence is required to determine the chain of ownership and the manner in which the land was disposed of. The court applied the principles under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and relevant case law, emphasizing that the necessity of a party's presence is not limited to the existence of a cause of action but extends to ensuring all questions in the...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs
Orders
- The Notice of Motion application dated 19th August, 2020 is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the Plaintiffs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment