[2024] KEHC 2930 (KLR)
The court found that continued detention of the petitioner under the President's pleasure is unconstitutional, as established in multiple precedents. The psychiatric evaluation confirmed the petitioner no longer suffers from mental illness and poses no danger to society. Therefore, there is no legal basis for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 2930 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: POO; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E004 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Sentence Review Ruling
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; petitioner to be released from custody and placed on probation.
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Insanity Defence, Unconstitutional Sentencing, Presidential Pleasure Detention, Mental Health Evaluation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
POO
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Sentence Review Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether continued detention of the petitioner under the President's pleasure is constitutional.
- 2 Whether the petitioner, having been found sane by a psychiatrist, should be released from custody.
- 3 Whether the petitioner poses a danger to society warranting continued detention.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that continued detention of the petitioner under the President's pleasure is unconstitutional, as established in multiple precedents. The psychiatric evaluation confirmed the petitioner no longer suffers from mental illness and poses no danger to society. Therefore, there is no legal basis for continued incarceration. The court ordered the immediate release of the petitioner from prison custody and imposed a six-month probation order to facilitate his reintegration into society under the supervision of the Busia County Director of Probation and Aftercare Services.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; petitioner to be released from custody and placed on probation.
Orders
- The petitioner shall be released forthwith from prison custody.
- The petitioner shall serve a probation order for 6 months under the care and supervision of the Busia County Director of Probation and Aftercare Services.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
POO v Republic (Criminal Petition E004 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 2930 (KLR) (22 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 2930 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Criminal Petition E004 of 2023
WM Musyoka, J
March 22, 2024
Between
POO
Petitioner
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The petitioner seeks review of his sentence. He had been found guilty of murder, but insane, on 18th February 2019. He was sentenced to be detained at Busia GK Prison, pending the order of the President of the Republic.
2. The Republic has submitted that the petition is not merited, for the petitioner has not demonstrated that there is new compelling evidence to warrant review. It is submitted that a person serving a sentence such as that imposed on the petitioner was to be kept in prison until it is determined that he is not a danger to the society. Kimaru & 17 others vs. Attorney-General [2022] KEHC 114 (KLR)(Mrima, J) is cited.
3. On 16th February 2024, I delivered a ruling herein, where I directed that the petitioner be presented before a psychiatrist for evaluation of his current mental status. That was done, and a report has been placed on record, dated 27th February 2024. It indicates that the petitioner displays no mental illness.
4. Detention of persons with mental challenges, convicted of murder or any other offence, is really not a punishment, for the trial court will have found that that person did not have the requisite mental capacity, at the time of the actus reus, to form an intention to commit the offence, or to have the knowledge that his conduct was wrong or prohibited. There would be no mens rea on his part, for commission of the offence. It was stated, in Wakesho vs. Republic [2021] KECA 223 (KLR) (Kairu, Mbogholi-Msagha & Nyamweya, JJA), that such a person would be incapable of understanding what he is doing, or knowing that what he is doing is wrong, and that such a person would not be criminally liable.
5. Detention, during the pleasure of the President of the Republic, has been declared unconstitutional. See Republic vs. SOM [2017] eKLR (Majanja, J), Republic vs. ENW [2019] eKLR (Lesiit, J), Wakesho vs. Republic [2021] KECA 223 (KLR) (Kairu, Mbogholi-Msagha & Nyamweya, JJA) and Kimaru & 17 others vs. Attorney-General [2022] KEHC 114 (KLR)(Mrima, J). So, if that is so, no one should serve that sentence. Indeed, I said in my ruling of 16th February 2024, herein, following Kimaru & 17 others vs. Attorney-General [2022] KEHC 114 (KLR)(Mrima, J), that the petitioner herein should have been produced before a Judge sooner, so that he could be rid of the unconstitutional sentence.
6. The psychiatrist has given the petitioner a clean bill of mental health, as he displays no sign of mental illness. That would mean that he poses no danger to society. Consequently, the order that I shall make herein is to direct that the petitioner herein be released forthwith from prison custody. I shall further, direct, for the purpose of being assisted to find his bearing, once he gets back to society, that he shall serve a probation order, for 6 months, under the care and supervision of the Busia County Director of Probation and Aftercare Services. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT BUSIA ON THIS 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2024WM MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant.Mr. Philip Okurutu Okisai, the petitioner, in person.AdvocatesMs. Chepkonga, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the respondent.