[2004] KEHC 673 (KLR)
The court found that the Plaintiff had proved its claim on a balance of probabilities through uncontroverted documentary and oral evidence. The Defendant failed to attend the hearing or challenge the Plaintiff's evidence. The Plaintiff demonstrated that it had granted the Defendant an overdraft facility, which was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 673 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Post Bank Credit Ltd (In Liquidation); Defendant: Specialised Suppliers Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 755 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Loan Default, Overdraft Facilities, Compound Interest, Debt Recovery
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Post Bank Credit Ltd (In Liquidation)
Plaintiff
Specialised Suppliers Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff in the sum claimed for banking facilities granted.
- 2 Whether the interest charged by the Plaintiff was improper, excessive, or compounded arbitrarily without agreement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiff had proved its claim on a balance of probabilities through uncontroverted documentary and oral evidence. The Defendant failed to attend the hearing or challenge the Plaintiff's evidence. The Plaintiff demonstrated that it had granted the Defendant an overdraft facility, which was not repaid as agreed, and that the outstanding sum as of 31st December 1995 was Kshs 5,727,722.85. The Plaintiff was therefore entitled to judgment for the amended sum, together with compound interest at 18% per annum from 31st December 1995 until payment in full, and costs of the suit.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Judgment entered for the Plaintiff against the Defendant for Kshs 5,727,722.85.
- Compound interest at 18% per annum from 31st December 1995 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL DIVISION – MILIMANI
CIVIL CASE NO. 755 OF 1996
POST BANK CREDIT LTD
IN LIQUIDATION:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
SPECIAALISED SUPPLIERS LTD ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANT
JUDGEMENT
By a Plaint dated 26th March 1996 the Plaintiff instituted this suit against the Defendant seeking a sum of Kshs 5,872,535. 70 together with compound interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum from 31st December, 1995 until payment in full. The claim is pursuant to banking accommodation and facilities granted to the Defendant by the Plaintiff at the Defendant’s request.
The Defendant filed a defence on 25th June 1996 in which it denied indebtedness to the Plaintiff in the sum claimed but averred that if it was indebted to the Plaintiff for any sum the same was far less than the sum claimed. There was also an averrement that the interest charged was improper excessive and compounded arbitrarily and in the absence of agreement on the part of the Defendant.
The case came up for hearing before me on 11th April, 2005. The Defendant and its Counsel failed to attend despite a hearing notice having been served upon Counsel for the Defendant.
The Plaintiff called one witness Benjamin Bargetuny, the Plaintiff’s Liquidation Assistant Manager. Before commencing his testimony, Counsel for the Plaintiff sought leave of the Court to amend the figure of the sum claimed from shs 5,872,535. 70 to 5,727,722. 85. I granted the leave sought and the figure was duly amended.
Benjamin Barngetuny, told the Court that he did debt collection in the process of liquidating the Plaintiff. In the course of his duties he came to know the Defendant as a client of the Plaintiff. The Defendant had on 10th March, 1993 applied for overdraft facilities of Kshs 3 million. The application was successful and the overdraft facilities were granted for the said sum for a period of 3 months. A letter of offer was on 27th April 1993 sent from the Plaintiff to the Defendant who in turn accepted the offer on 29th April 1993. The Defendant was allowed to draw the money. The expiry period for the facility was 5th July, 1993. However, by 28th September, 1993 the facility had not been repaid and by a letter of even date the Defendant proposed a mode of repayment. The repayment proposed was not kept. On 11th July, 1994, the Defendant wrote to the Plaintiff and promised to repay its entire indebtedness within six (6) months w.e.f. 11th August 1994. This proposal was not kept with the result that by the time the Plaintiff filed this suit the Defendant was still indebted to the Plaintiff. The witness produced as a bundle P.Ex.1 the Letter applying for the facility, the Letter of Offer, correspondence exchanged and a statement of account which showed that by 31st December, 1995 the Defendant was indebted to the Plaintiff in the sum of Kshs 5,727,722. 85.
On the basis of the uncontroverted evidence tendered by the Plaintiff’s witness, Benjamin Barngetuny I am satisfied that the Plaintiff has proved its case against the Defendant on a balance of probabilities and is entitled to judgment as prayed in the Plaint. The Plaintiff shall also have the costs of this suit.
Orders accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 16TH DAY OF MAY 2005.
F. AZANGALALA
JUDGE