[2020] KEELC 2643 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 2643 (KLR)

The court found that the Defendant and Dave Munya Mwangi were served with the court order of 2/4/2020 through multiple channels, including personal service, email, and WhatsApp, and that they had actual knowledge of the order. Despite this, they continued with excavation and construction works on the suit property,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 2643 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Premier Daffodil Limited; Respondent: Speedbird Travel & Safaris Ltd; Respondent: Dave Munya Mwangi; Respondent: Phyllies Wanjiru Mwangi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 53 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
Defendant and Dave Munya Mwangi found guilty of contempt of court; orders granted as prayed against them.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Injunctive Orders, Service of Process, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Injunctive Orders Service of Process Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Premier Daffodil Limited

Applicant

Speedbird Travel & Safaris Ltd

Respondent

Dave Munya Mwangi

Respondent

Phyllies Wanjiru Mwangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the court order of 2/4/2020 was duly served upon the Defendant and its directors.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant and its directors complied with the court order of 2/4/2020.
  3. 3 Whether the Defendant and/or its directors are guilty of contempt of court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Defendant and Dave Munya Mwangi were served with the court order of 2/4/2020 through multiple channels, including personal service, email, and WhatsApp, and that they had actual knowledge of the order. Despite this, they continued with excavation and construction works on the suit property, as evidenced by photographs and admissions in affidavits. The court held that personal service is not mandatory where knowledge is established, and that willful disobedience of a court order constitutes contempt. There was insufficient evidence of service on Phyllies Wanjiru Mwangi. Consequently, the Defendant and Dave Munya Mwangi were found guilty of contempt of court for...

Court Disposition

Defendant and Dave Munya Mwangi found guilty of contempt of court; orders granted as prayed against them.

Orders

  • Dave Munya Mwangi is committed to civil jail for 60 days.
  • The Defendant shall pay a fine of Kshs. 1,000,000 for contempt of court.