[2018] KEHC 8381 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 8381 (KLR)

The court found that the application to amend the plaint was merited and unopposed. Given that the plaintiff and the interested party were now aligned in their interests and approach to the case, and that the interested party appeared to be the most aggrieved and likely to present the most critical evidence, it was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 8381 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Presbyterian Foundation; Defendant: Charles Ndungu Waithaka; Interested Party: Margaret Wanjiku Wariuki; Interested Party: Grace Wahito Ngari; Interested Party: Obadiah Kairi Maina
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 67 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint and Enjoin Interested Party as Co Plaintiff
Outcome
Application for amendment of plaint allowed with directions.
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties, Trusts in Land, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Joinder of Parties Trusts in Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Presbyterian Foundation

Plaintiff

Charles Ndungu Waithaka

Defendant

Margaret Wanjiku Wariuki

Interested Party

Grace Wahito Ngari

Interested Party

Obadiah Kairi Maina

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint and Enjoin Interested Party as Co Plaintiff

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend the plaint to reflect its position as trustee for the interested party.
  2. 2 Whether the interested party should be enjoined as co-plaintiff instead of remaining as interested party.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application to amend the plaint was merited and unopposed. Given that the plaintiff and the interested party were now aligned in their interests and approach to the case, and that the interested party appeared to be the most aggrieved and likely to present the most critical evidence, it was appropriate to enjoin Dr. Arthur Parish as co-plaintiff rather than retain its status as interested party. The court exercised its discretion to allow the amendment of the plaint, with the direction that the interested party be redesignated as co-plaintiff, and ordered that the amended plaint be filed and served within 14 days.

Court Disposition

Application for amendment of plaint allowed with directions.

Orders

  • Dr. Arthur Parish to be enjoined as co-plaintiff and designation as interested party to change accordingly.
  • Plaintiff granted leave to amend the plaint to reflect the new position and proper cause of action.