[2010] KEHC 3243 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 3243 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff had proved ownership of the suit land by producing a certificate of lease and evidence of purchase. The Defendants, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not challenge the Plaintiff's evidence. The court held that the Plaintiff, as the registered owner, is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 3243 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: The Presbyterian Foundation (suing for and on behalf of P.C.E.A Ayub Kinyua Parish); Defendant: John Ekai Achiviha & 10 Others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 140 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment After Default of Appearance and Formal Proof
Outcome
Plaintiff's suit allowed in part; permanent injunction and eviction orders granted; claim for general damages dismissed.
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Eviction Orders, Permanent Injunctions, Title Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Trespass to Land Eviction Orders Permanent Injunctions Title Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Presbyterian Foundation (suing for and on behalf of P.C.E.A Ayub Kinyua Parish)

Plaintiff

John Ekai Achiviha & 10 Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment After Default of Appearance and Formal Proof

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land and entitled to possession.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendants are trespassers on the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction and eviction orders against the Defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff had proved ownership of the suit land by producing a certificate of lease and evidence of purchase. The Defendants, having failed to enter appearance or file a defence, did not challenge the Plaintiff's evidence. The court held that the Plaintiff, as the registered owner, is entitled to exclusive possession and to restrain trespassers. The claim for general damages failed due to lack of evidence. The court granted a permanent injunction, eviction orders, and costs to the Plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's suit allowed in part; permanent injunction and eviction orders granted; claim for general damages dismissed.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the Defendants by themselves, their servants, or agents from remaining on the suit land.
  • The Defendants to be evicted from the suit land.