[2021] KEHC 4959 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 4959 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had complied with the requirements of Section 36 of the Arbitration Act by filing certified copies of the arbitral award and contract through a Supplementary Affidavit. The court determined that the omission of the affidavit from the court file at the time of the earlier ruling was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 4959 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Pride Enterprises Limited; Respondent: Kenya National Highways Authority
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 124 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Arbitration Award Enforcement, Recognition of Foreign Awards, Arbitration Act Section 36, Costs of Application
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitration Award Enforcement Recognition of Foreign Awards Arbitration Act Section 36 Costs of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pride Enterprises Limited

Applicant

Kenya National Highways Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award

  1. 1 Whether the applicant complied with Section 36 of the Arbitration Act for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award.
  2. 2 Whether the court should recognize and adopt the arbitral awards as a judgment of the court.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had complied with the requirements of Section 36 of the Arbitration Act by filing certified copies of the arbitral award and contract through a Supplementary Affidavit. The court determined that the omission of the affidavit from the court file at the time of the earlier ruling was inadvertent and, upon perusal, confirmed that all statutory prerequisites for recognition and enforcement had been satisfied. Consequently, the court recognized and adopted the arbitral awards as a judgment of the court and granted leave to enforce the award as a decree. The respondent was ordered to bear the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Final Award published on 21st January 2019 and the Additional Award published on 1st April 2019 are recognized and adopted as a judgment of the court.
  • Leave is granted to the applicant to enforce the award as a decree of the court.