[2012] KEHC 3949 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 3949 (KLR)

The court found that since the interested party had already been joined to the proceedings by consent, the application to delay the ruling and revisit the joinder was unnecessary. The only remaining issue was the consent regarding the deposit of rent, which the interested party claimed was not authorized. However,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 3949 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Private Development Company Limited; Defendant: Rebecca Ngonyo; Defendant: Samuel Kamau Macharia
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 167 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Directions on Interlocutory Applications
Outcome
Application found purposeless and directions issued for progression of the main matter.
Judges
SP Ouko
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Consent Orders, Preliminary Objection, Interlocutory Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Joinder of Parties Consent Orders Preliminary Objection Interlocutory Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Private Development Company Limited

Plaintiff

Rebecca Ngonyo

Defendant

Samuel Kamau Macharia

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Directions on Interlocutory Applications

  1. 1 Whether the motion to delay the ruling pending on another application should be granted.
  2. 2 Whether the consent orders regarding joinder and deposit of rent should be set aside.
  3. 3 Whether the interested party's pleadings are properly on record.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the interested party had already been joined to the proceedings by consent, the application to delay the ruling and revisit the joinder was unnecessary. The only remaining issue was the consent regarding the deposit of rent, which the interested party claimed was not authorized. However, the court noted that all relevant pleadings, including the preliminary objection and affidavit filed by the interested party's former advocate, were on record and would be considered in the substantive ruling. The court thus directed that the ruling on the main application would proceed as scheduled and that the files be consolidated as per earlier consent orders.

Court Disposition

Application found purposeless and directions issued for progression of the main matter.

Orders

  • The ruling shall be delivered on 29th June, 2012.
  • Relevant files to be forwarded for consolidation within 14 days as per consent orders of 6th March, 2012.