[2022] KEHC 3300 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 3300 (KLR)

The court found that, upon reviewing the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses (PW1 to PW5), the evidence presented was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with the law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 3300 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused: Luka Esekiel Barasa alias Sipweche
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case 23 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether Accused Has a Case to Answer
Outcome
Accused found to have a case to answer and ordered to be put on his defence.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Case to Answer, Prima Facie Evidence, Criminal Trial Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Case to Answer Prima Facie Evidence Criminal Trial Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Luka Esekiel Barasa alias Sipweche

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Whether Accused Has a Case to Answer

  1. 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant putting him on his defence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, upon reviewing the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses (PW1 to PW5), the evidence presented was sufficient to establish a prima facie case against the accused. Consequently, the accused is required to be put on his defence in accordance with the law.

Court Disposition

Accused found to have a case to answer and ordered to be put on his defence.

Orders

  • The accused is put on his defence.