[2022] KEHC 504 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence, through the testimony of 10 witnesses and medical evidence confirming the cause of death as gun-shot injuries at close range, to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The accused was placed at the scene of the crime at the material...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 504 (KLR)
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Republic; Defendant: Sebastian Ambani Musungu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 11 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to be put on his defence.
- Judges
- FA Ochieng
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Burden of Proof, Prima Facie Case, Criminal Liability
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Prosecutor
Sebastian Ambani Musungu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant his being put on his defence.
- 2 Whether the evidence links the accused to the offence of murder.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had adduced sufficient evidence, through the testimony of 10 witnesses and medical evidence confirming the cause of death as gun-shot injuries at close range, to establish a prima facie case against the accused. The accused was placed at the scene of the crime at the material time, and the evidence, if left unchallenged, would be sufficient to justify a conviction. Therefore, the accused is required to tender explanations and evidence in his defence, as he has a case to answer under Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer; ordered to be put on his defence.
Orders
- The accused is found to have a case to answer and is placed on his defence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Prosecutor v Musungu (Criminal Case 11 of 2018) [2022] KEHC 504 (KLR) (28 April 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 504 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Case 11 of 2018
FA Ochieng, J
April 28, 2022
Between
Prosecutor
Republic
and
Sebastian Ambani Musungu
Accused
Ruling
The accused, Sabastian Ambani Musungu, was charged with the offence of Murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. 1. The particulars of the offence indicate that the victim, Brian Danstan Chacha, was murdered by the accused at Mamboleo Market, on 10th May 2018.
2. The prosecution has called 10 witnesses.
3. From the evidence on record, the cause of death was multiple penetrative injuries on the head and chest. The said injuries were described as being consistent with gun-shot injuries, at close range.
4. The prosecution witnesses have placed the accused at the scene of crime, at the material time.
5. The evidence appears, on a prima facie basis, to link the accused to the shooting, which resulted in the death of the victim.
6. In the circumstances, I hold the considered view that unless the accused is able to tender satisfactory explanations and evidence, the court may find him culpable.
7. In effect, I find that the accused has a case to answer.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 28 TH DAY OF APRIL 2022FRED A OCHIENGJUDGE