[2022] KEHC 15009 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 15009 (KLR)

The court found that, although the prosecution argued there was no change of circumstances, the fact that some co-accused had already secured sureties and were out on bond was a relevant consideration. The court determined that it would be in the interests of justice to revise the bond terms for the 2nd accused. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 15009 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Republic; Defendant: Jonathan Muema Mutune; Defendant: Benard Mutie Muthani; Defendant: Kelvin Emojong; Defendant: Bwato Mohammed
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Case E004 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Revision Application
Outcome
application for revision of bond terms allowed in part
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Bail and Bond, Revision of Bond Terms, Change of Circumstances, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail and Bond Revision of Bond Terms Change of Circumstances Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Republic

Applicant

Jonathan Muema Mutune

Defendant

Benard Mutie Muthani

Defendant

Kelvin Emojong

Defendant

Bwato Mohammed

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Case / Ruling on Bond Revision Application

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd accused is entitled to a revision of the bond terms previously set by the court.
  2. 2 Whether there has been a change of circumstances to justify the revision of bond terms.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, although the prosecution argued there was no change of circumstances, the fact that some co-accused had already secured sureties and were out on bond was a relevant consideration. The court determined that it would be in the interests of justice to revise the bond terms for the 2nd accused. The court exercised its discretion to revise the bond terms, allowing the 2nd accused to be released on a bond of Kshs 1,000,000 with one surety of a similar amount or an alternative cash bail of Kshs 100,000. All other terms of bond were to remain as previously ordered.

Court Disposition

application for revision of bond terms allowed in part

Orders

  • The 2nd accused may be released on a bond of Kshs 1,000,000 with one surety of a similar amount or an alternative cash bail of Kshs 100,000.
  • All other terms of bond shall remain as earlier ordered.