[2017] KEHC 2622 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2622 (KLR)

The court determined that it would be improper to address the application substantively before the confirmation of the grant, as the central issue is the confirmation itself. The wishes of the deceased, as set out in the will, are clear and binding, particularly the restriction on disposal of the estate for 50...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 2622 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Protus Masibo Watibin; Respondent: Concepter Wanjala Watibin; Respondent: Vertonica Watibin
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 82 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Directions and Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application held in abeyance; directions issued for confirmation of grant and protection of estate.
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Confirmation of Grant, Wills and Testamentary Dispositions, Administration of Estates
Source Language
en
Family and Children Confirmation of Grant Wills and Testamentary Dispositions Administration of Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Protus Masibo Watibin

Applicant

Concepter Wanjala Watibin

Respondent

Vertonica Watibin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Directions and Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the application should be determined before confirmation of grant.
  2. 2 Whether the wishes of the deceased as expressed in the will should be enforced regarding non-disposal of the estate for 50 years.
  3. 3 Whether the parties are complying with previous court directions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that it would be improper to address the application substantively before the confirmation of the grant, as the central issue is the confirmation itself. The wishes of the deceased, as set out in the will, are clear and binding, particularly the restriction on disposal of the estate for 50 years. The court found that the parties are recognized beneficiaries and there is no dispute as to their status. To ensure compliance with the law and the testator's wishes, the court held the application in abeyance, ordered the construction and secure storage of a skeleton file, prohibited intermeddling in the estate, and directed that the grant be confirmed within 30 days. The...

Court Disposition

Application held in abeyance; directions issued for confirmation of grant and protection of estate.

Orders

  • A skeleton file be constructed and kept under lock and key by the Deputy Registrar.
  • No stranger should intermeddle in the estate of the deceased or at all.