[2024] KEELRC 2217 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 2217 (KLR)

The Court found that Clause 11(a) of the CBA, which set the mandatory retirement age for academic staff at 75 years, was contrary to established government policy and institutional practice, both of which set the retirement age at 70 years. The Union failed to provide evidence to rebut the Employer's assertion that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2217 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Pwani University Council; Respondent: Universities Academic Staff Union; Interested Party: Ministry of Labour and Social Protection; Interested Party: Attorney General
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
CBA E082 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Collective Bargaining Agreement Registration / Ruling on Objection to Registration of CBA Clause
Outcome
Objection allowed; parties directed to renegotiate and submit revised CBA.
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Collective Bargaining Agreements, Retirement Age Policy, Registration of Cba, Public Sector Employment, Industrial Relations
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Collective Bargaining Agreements Retirement Age Policy Registration of Cba Public Sector Employment Industrial Relations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pwani University Council

Applicant

Universities Academic Staff Union

Respondent

Ministry of Labour and Social Protection

Interested Party

Attorney General

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Collective Bargaining Agreement Registration / Ruling on Objection to Registration of CBA Clause

  1. 1 Whether Clause 11(a) of the CBA, setting the mandatory retirement age at 75 years, is contrary to government policy and institutional practice.
  2. 2 Whether the Court should register the CBA as agreed by the parties or require renegotiation of the impugned clause.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that Clause 11(a) of the CBA, which set the mandatory retirement age for academic staff at 75 years, was contrary to established government policy and institutional practice, both of which set the retirement age at 70 years. The Union failed to provide evidence to rebut the Employer's assertion that the clause was inconsistent with these standards. The Court emphasized that registration of a CBA is not a mere formality and must comply with relevant laws and policies. As a result, the Court allowed the Employer's objection and directed the parties to renegotiate the impugned clause and submit a revised CBA for registration within fourteen days.

Court Disposition

Objection allowed; parties directed to renegotiate and submit revised CBA.

Orders

  • The parties are directed to submit a revised CBA within fourteen (14) days from the date of this ruling.
  • Each party will bear their own costs.