[2009] KEHC 4057 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent failed to file an application challenging the taxation of costs within the statutory period after being supplied with reasons for taxation. There was no valid application pending before the court to challenge the taxation at the time of hearing the applicant's motion. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 4057 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Queensway Air Services Limited; Respondent: The Commissioner of Income Tax
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 1231 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Release of Deposited Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Taxed Costs, Release of Funds, Enlargement of Time, Objection to Taxation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Queensway Air Services Limited
Applicant
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Release of Deposited Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to the release of the deposited taxed costs in the absence of a valid pending challenge to taxation.
- 2 Whether the respondent's delay in filing an application to challenge taxation disentitles it to oppose the release of funds.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to file an application challenging the taxation of costs within the statutory period after being supplied with reasons for taxation. There was no valid application pending before the court to challenge the taxation at the time of hearing the applicant's motion. The respondent's attempt to file an application for extension of time on the eve of the hearing was not a sufficient ground to delay the release of the taxed costs. The court held that it would be unjust to continue withholding the applicant's money in the absence of a valid challenge, and therefore allowed the application for release of the deposited funds.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The sum of KShs. 712,657 deposited in court by the respondent as taxed costs shall be released to the applicant's advocates.
- There will be no order as to costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Misc Case 1231 of 2003
QUEENSWAY AIR SERVICES LIMITED ......................PLAINTIFF
V E R S U S
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ................DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
The Applicant herein, QUEENSWAY AIR SERVICES LIMITED, has sought by notice of motion dated 10th November, 2008an order that a sum of KShs. 712,657/00 deposited into court by the Respondent, THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, be released to its advocates. The said amount constitutes the Applicant’s taxed costs awarded herein on 11th December, 2003 (Lenaola J). The costs were taxed on 29th January, 2007. The deposit into court was made pursuant to an order of the court of 28th May, 2007 (Nambuye, J) as a condition for enlargement of time to enable the Respondent to file a notice of objection to taxation under paragraph 11 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order.
The Respondent duly lodged his notice of objection to taxation on 8th August, 2007 within the enlarged time. Reasons for taxation were supplied to the Respondent on 14th May, 2008. But he did not file an application challenging the taxation within 14 days of that date as provided for under paragraph 11(2) of the remuneration order.
The Respondent was served with the present application on 17th November, 2008 (coming up for hearing on 28th January, 2009). He waited until the eve of the hearing, that is, 27th January, 2009, to file and serve a replying affidavit. At the same time he filed an application by notice of motion of the same date seeking extension of time to file an application to challenge the taxation. His plea that his said application be heard first was refused, and the court heard the Applicant’s present application.
There is no valid application pending challenging taxation of the Applicant’s costs. As such, it would be unjust to keep the Applicant from its money. The replying affidavit does not raise any issue that would disentitle the Applicant to its money at this belated stage.
I will in the circumstances allow the application by notice of motion dated 10th November, 2008 and grant an order in terms of prayer 1 of the application. There will be no order as to costs of the application. Those will be the orders of the court.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009
H. P. G. WAWERU
J U D G E
DELIVERED THIS 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2009