[2025] KECPT 221 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 221 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to comply with its directive to provide a comprehensive audit of the respondent's loan account from the time of joining to exit. Instead, the claimant merely reproduced previously filed statements, which did not clarify the discrepancies or substantiate the claimed sum of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 221 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Queensway Sacco Limited; Respondent: Michael Mbogo Kigundu
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 553 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Final Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed with costs
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw
Legal Topics
Loan Account Audit, Burden of Proof, Member Statement Discrepancy, Debt Recovery
Source Language
en
Banking and Finance Civil Procedure Loan Account Audit Burden of Proof Member Statement Discrepancy Debt Recovery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Queensway Sacco Limited

Applicant

Michael Mbogo Kigundu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant proved the debt of Kshs 1,361,877 allegedly owed by the respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant complied with the tribunal's order to audit the respondent's loan account from inception to exit.
  3. 3 Whether the evidence filed by the claimant sufficiently clarified the amount claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to comply with its directive to provide a comprehensive audit of the respondent's loan account from the time of joining to exit. Instead, the claimant merely reproduced previously filed statements, which did not clarify the discrepancies or substantiate the claimed sum of Kshs 1,361,877. The tribunal concluded that the claimant did not discharge its burden of proof and failed to demonstrate how the amount claimed was arrived at. As a result, the claim was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The claimant's claim is dismissed with costs to the respondent.