[2016] KEHC 8316 (KLR)
The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent was not consummated due to the respondent's refusal, and that the parties had irreconcilable differences, with the respondent expressly consenting to the declaration of nullity. There was no evidence to controvert the petitioner's account. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 8316 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: R S M; Respondent: A R M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 1 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed. Marriage declared null and void.
- Judges
- AO Muchelule, REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Nullity of Marriage, Non Consummation, Irretrievable Breakdown, Consent to Nullity
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R S M
Petitioner
A R M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent should be declared null and void due to non-consummation.
- 2 Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent was not consummated due to the respondent's refusal, and that the parties had irreconcilable differences, with the respondent expressly consenting to the declaration of nullity. There was no evidence to controvert the petitioner's account. The court accepted the petitioner's evidence, found that the marriage had broken down beyond repair, and, more importantly, that it was not consummated. On these grounds, the court declared the marriage null and void.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed. Marriage declared null and void.
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent is declared null and void.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 1 OF 2016
R S M.................................................PETITIONER
A R M............................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner is a Kenyan national and the respondent is an Indian national. They got married on 21st September 2012 in India and came to settle in their matrimonial home at Flat No. [particulars withheld], Westlands in Nairobi. They lived together for one year until about July/August 2013 when the respondent left the marriage and returned to India where she presently lives. The petitioner went to India to try and get her to return but she refused. Since then, they do not communicate. He stated that as far as he is concerned the marriage has broken down beyond repair.
2. The respondent filed a reply to the petition whose paragraph 8(c) stated as follows:-
“8(c) With reference to paragraph 8c it is true the differences have occurred between us which are now irretrievable for reconciliation. I am also not interested to stay with him as his wife and am willingly giving my consent for the NULL & VOID declaration as stated in the prayer clause of the petition.”
3. The petitioner adopted the petition and supporting affidavit as his evidence. In paragraphs 7 and 8 of the petition and paragraph 2 of the supporting affidavit he stated that the marriage was not consummated owing to refusal by the respondent.
4. The respondent did not attend the court to testify. There was no evidence to controvert what was stated by the petitioner. I accept the petitioner’s evidence, and find that the marriage was broken down and cannot be repaired. But more important, the marriage was not consummated. I, consequently, declare it null and void. The petitioner did not ask for costs.
SIGNED at NAIROBI this 14th day of NOVEMBER 2016.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 17th NOVEMBER 2016.
R.E. OUGO
JUDGE