[2017] KEHC 5289 (KLR)
The court found that the Objector, though initially cited and served, failed to participate in the citation proceedings, resulting in the Petitioner being properly allowed to petition for the grant. The Petitioner, as a creditor, was entitled to apply for the grant after the Objector did not act. However, with the Objector now willing to take up administration and in light of the need to consider the interests of the deceased’s children, the court held that the grant to the Petitioner should be revoked and a fresh grant issued to the Objector. The Petitioner’s claim as purchaser/creditor can be ventilated in subsequent proceedings. The alleged conflict of interest by the Petitioner’s...
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 5289 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Rabecca Mbithe Mutua; Objector: L N G
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2017
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 513 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- grant revoked; fresh grant to objector; status quo on property; costs to objector
- Judges
- BC Koech
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Non Disclosure of Beneficiaries, Citation Procedure, Administrator Appointment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rabecca Mbithe Mutua
Petitioner
L N G
Objector
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to the Petitioner should be revoked due to alleged non-disclosure of beneficiaries and lack of service of citation upon the Objector.
- 2 Whether the Objector, as mother of the deceased, and other beneficiaries were properly notified and given an opportunity to petition for grant of administration.
- 3 Whether the Petitioner, as a purchaser/creditor, was entitled to petition for the grant after citation proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Objector, though initially cited and served, failed to participate in the citation proceedings, resulting in the Petitioner being properly allowed to petition for the grant. The Petitioner, as a creditor, was entitled to apply for the grant after the Objector did not act. However, with the Objector now willing to take up administration and in light of the need to consider the interests of the deceased’s children, the court held that the grant to the Petitioner should be revoked and a fresh grant issued to the Objector. The Petitioner’s claim as purchaser/creditor can be ventilated in subsequent proceedings. The alleged conflict of interest by the Petitioner’s...
Court Disposition
grant revoked; fresh grant to objector; status quo on property; costs to objector
Orders
- The Grant of Letters of Administration Intestate issued to Rabecca Mbithe Mutua on 6/8/2012 is revoked and a fresh grant to be issued in the name of L N G.
- The new Administrator L N G to file fresh Summons for Confirmation of Grant within sixty (60) days and serve upon Rabecca Mbithe Mutua, who may file affidavit of protest if necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment