[2019] KEHC 919 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 919 (KLR)

The court found that the appellants had failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal for over a year after its reinstatement, including failing to file the record of appeal. This prolonged inaction infringed on the applicant's legitimate expectation for expeditious resolution of disputes. The appellants...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 919 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Radio Africa Group Limited t/a The Star; Appellant: Justus Ochieng; Applicant: James Mwangi Mwaniki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Citation Cause 54 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Appeal withdrawn; costs awarded to applicant.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Withdrawal, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Withdrawal Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Radio Africa Group Limited t/a The Star

Appellant

Justus Ochieng

Appellant

James Mwangi Mwaniki

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inaction by the appellants.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application and the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellants had failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal for over a year after its reinstatement, including failing to file the record of appeal. This prolonged inaction infringed on the applicant's legitimate expectation for expeditious resolution of disputes. The appellants subsequently filed a notice of withdrawal of the appeal. The court held that the appeal stood withdrawn and ordered the appellants to bear the costs of both the appeal and the application, in accordance with the principles of expeditious justice and the general rule that costs follow the event.

Court Disposition

Appeal withdrawn; costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

  • The appeal is marked as withdrawn.
  • The appellants shall bear the costs of the appeal and the application dated 11th September, 2019.