[2016] KEHC 4255 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 4255 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was the confirmed administrator of the estate and that the restriction on the suit land was placed by the respondent, who was neither a petitioner nor a beneficiary. The respondent was properly served with notice of the hearing but failed to appear or oppose the application. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 4255 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rafu Njura Mbogo; Respondent: Mary Igoki Mbogo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 4 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Removal of Restriction
Outcome
Application allowed. Restriction on land parcel Kyeni/Mufu/6250 to be removed. No order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Removal of Land Restriction, Administration of Estates, Confirmed Grant, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Removal of Land Restriction Administration of Estates Confirmed Grant Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rafu Njura Mbogo

Applicant

Mary Igoki Mbogo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Removal of Restriction

  1. 1 Whether the restriction registered on land parcel Kyeni/Mufu/6250 should be removed.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was properly served and given adequate notice of the application.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the orders sought given the unchallenged confirmed grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was the confirmed administrator of the estate and that the restriction on the suit land was placed by the respondent, who was neither a petitioner nor a beneficiary. The respondent was properly served with notice of the hearing but failed to appear or oppose the application. The confirmed grant had not been challenged or revoked. In these circumstances, the restriction was unjustified and its removal was warranted to allow the administrator to deal with the estate property as authorized by the grant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Restriction on land parcel Kyeni/Mufu/6250 to be removed. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • The restriction entered in respect of land parcel Kyeni/Mufu/6250 is hereby removed.
  • No order as to costs.