[2023] KEHC 562 (KLR)
The court found that while the original sentence of 25 years was within the law, the applicant had demonstrated remorse and reformation, and the sentence review report was favourable. The court noted that although the trial magistrate could have imposed a life sentence, enhancing the sentence to more than double the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 562 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Mwajoto Rai; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E117 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
- Outcome
- sentence_reduced_and_supervision_ordered
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Review, Sexual Offences, Mitigation, Remission of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Mwajoto Rai
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's sentence of 25 years imprisonment for rape should be reduced in light of his remorse and reformation.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise discretion to review the sentence in line with recent jurisprudence on sentencing for sexual offences.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the original sentence of 25 years was within the law, the applicant had demonstrated remorse and reformation, and the sentence review report was favourable. The court noted that although the trial magistrate could have imposed a life sentence, enhancing the sentence to more than double the minimum was excessive in the circumstances. Considering the applicant's mitigation, the time already served, and the principles established in recent jurisprudence, the court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence to 10 years imprisonment from the date of conviction, with a further order for 3 years' supervision under a Probation Officer upon completion of the...
Court Disposition
sentence_reduced_and_supervision_ordered
Orders
- The sentence is reviewed to 10 years imprisonment from the date of conviction.
- Upon completion of the sentence, the applicant will be committed to supervision under a Probation Officer for 3 years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Rai v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E117 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 562 (KLR) (2 February 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 562 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E117 of 2022
A. Ong’injo, J
February 2, 2023
Between
Paul Mwajoto Rai
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Mombasa H.C.CR.A. No. 97 of 2018 and the Judge dismissed Criminal Appeal 97 of 2018 )
Ruling
1. Applicant was convicted for the offence of rape contrary to Section 3(1) as read with Section 3(3) of the Sexual Offences Act in Kwale Chief Magistrates Court CR. Case No. 962 of 2014 and sentenced to serve 30 years imprisonment.
2. He appeared in Mombasa H.C.CR.A. No. 97 of 2018 and the Judge dismissed his appeal but reviewed the sentence to 25 years to run from 22nd August 2014.
3. The applicant has ow come before this court seeking that the sentence of 25 years be reduced because he was remorseful and totally reformed. He also sought that this court exercises discretion in line with the holding in Phillip Mueke Maingi & 5 Others v DPP & AG– Petition No. E017 of 2021 [2022] eKLR.
4. From the appeal no. 97 of 2018 the Judge did point out that the applicant’s mitigation was considered before he was sentenced and the same mitigation was again raised during the hearing of his appeal. Reasons why the sentence of 25 years was imposed are that “he should have left the 81 years old grandmother to enjoy her sunset years in peace without fear of sexual abuse. The said offence must have traumatized her.
5. If he gets remission of 1/3 of 25 years’ jail term as per the Prison Service Act he would remain with only 17 years from 22nd August 2014. That means that he will complete his sentence in 2031, 8 years from now.
6. I have also considered the applicants sentence review report and find it is favourable.
7. The trial Magistrate was entitled to enhance the minimum sentence to life imprisonment but enhancing it more than the double minimum is in extreme in the circumstances.
8. The sentence is therefore reviewed to 10 years imprisonment from the date of conviction upon completion of the sentence the Applicant will be committed to supervision under Probation Officer under 3 years.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED BY E-MAIL THIS 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023. HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGEIn the presence of:-Ogwel- Court AssistantApplicant - Present in personMr. Ngiri for StateHON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGE