[2004] KEHC 1488 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner without cause for a continuous period of at least three years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. The evidence adduced by the petitioner, which was unchallenged due to the respondent's absence, established that the respondent neglected his parental duties, resulting in mental and psychological suffering to the petitioner and contributing to the death of their second child. The court was satisfied that the petitioner had not condoned the respondent's conduct nor colluded in bringing the petition. Consequently, the legal requirements for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of desertion and cruelty were met,...
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 1488 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: R.A.S.M; Respondent: D.E.W
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2004
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 60 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Breakdown, Desertion, Cruelty, Child Welfare
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R.A.S.M
Petitioner
D.E.W
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner without cause for at least three years preceding the petition.
- 2 Whether the respondent subjected the petitioner to cruelty by neglecting the children.
- 3 Whether the petitioner has condoned the respondent's conduct or colluded in the petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner without cause for a continuous period of at least three years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. The evidence adduced by the petitioner, which was unchallenged due to the respondent's absence, established that the respondent neglected his parental duties, resulting in mental and psychological suffering to the petitioner and contributing to the death of their second child. The court was satisfied that the petitioner had not condoned the respondent's conduct nor colluded in bringing the petition. Consequently, the legal requirements for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of desertion and cruelty were met,...
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- A decree of divorce is pronounced dissolving the marriage solemnized on 17th November 1991.
- Decree nisi to issue after six months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment