[2019] KEELC 2520 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2520 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated exclusive and uninterrupted possession of the suit property for a period exceeding twelve years. There was no evidence or testimony to the contrary from the respondent, who failed to appear or contest the claim. The applicant's occupation was open, continuous, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2520 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Rama Hassan Mangale; Respondent: Seyyeda Fehmeedah Begum
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 115 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the applicant
Judges
JO Olola
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Title Extinguishment, Land Registration, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Title Extinguishment Land Registration Limitation of Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rama Hassan Mangale

Applicant

Seyyeda Fehmeedah Begum

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has acquired title to Mgumo Patsa/Mazeras/522 by adverse possession.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's interest in the property should be extinguished under the Limitation of Actions Act.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to be registered as proprietor of the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated exclusive and uninterrupted possession of the suit property for a period exceeding twelve years. There was no evidence or testimony to the contrary from the respondent, who failed to appear or contest the claim. The applicant's occupation was open, continuous, and adverse to the interests of the registered owner. The court accepted the applicant's evidence, including photographs of structures and graves, as proof of long-term possession. Consequently, the court held that the applicant had satisfied the requirements for adverse possession under Kenyan law and was entitled to orders extinguishing the respondent's interest and registration...

Court Disposition

judgment for the applicant

Orders

  • The respondent's interest in Mgumo Patsa/Mazeras/522 is extinguished.
  • The Land Registrar Kilifi to delete the entry in favour of the respondent and/or register the appropriate discharge without gazettement.