[2019] KEHC 12237 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 12237 (KLR)

The court held that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional, and the court must exercise discretion in resentencing. Considering the facts that the Petitioner had already served 19 years, no one was injured during the robbery,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 12237 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ramadhan Ali; Respondent: The Director of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 54 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Petition for resentencing allowed; Petitioner sentenced to 25 years imprisonment from date of arrest.
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing Guidelines, Robbery With Violence, Death Penalty, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Guidelines Robbery With Violence Death Penalty Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ramadhan Ali

Applicant

The Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu and Another [2017] eKLR.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the Petitioner upon resentencing given the circumstances of the offence and the period already served.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional, and the court must exercise discretion in resentencing. Considering the facts that the Petitioner had already served 19 years, no one was injured during the robbery, and the Petitioner showed remorse and signs of reform, the court determined that a sentence of 25 years imprisonment from the date of arrest was appropriate to serve the objectives of punishment and justice.

Court Disposition

Petition for resentencing allowed; Petitioner sentenced to 25 years imprisonment from date of arrest.

Orders

  • The Petitioner is hereby jailed for 25 years from the date of arrest.
  • Right of appeal in 14 days.