[2018] KECA 321 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 321 (KLR)

The court found that although there was a delay of five years in filing the appeal, the applicant sufficiently explained the delay as being caused by the death of the original intended appellant and the subsequent process of obtaining a limited grant of letters of administration ad litem. The court noted that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KECA 321 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ramadhan Baraza Ozula; Respondent: Rose Adijah Baraza; Respondent: Fridah Nechesa Odero
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 38 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
GG Okwengu
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Judicial Discretion, Delay Explanation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Judicial Discretion Delay Explanation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ramadhan Baraza Ozula

Applicant

Rose Adijah Baraza

Respondent

Fridah Nechesa Odero

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the discretion to extend time under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules should be exercised in favour of the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the intended appeal is arguable and not frivolous.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although there was a delay of five years in filing the appeal, the applicant sufficiently explained the delay as being caused by the death of the original intended appellant and the subsequent process of obtaining a limited grant of letters of administration ad litem. The court noted that the applicant moved to file the application within a reasonable time after obtaining the grant. The memorandum of appeal indicated that the intended appeal was not frivolous. In the interest of justice, the court exercised its discretion to allow the extension of time for filing the appeal.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The notice of motion filed on 23rd April 2013 is allowed.
  • The applicant shall file and serve a record of appeal within thirty (30) days from the date hereof.