[2023] KECPT 46 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 46 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the claimant had proved his entitlement to a refund of Ksh 261,000 by providing a letter of withdrawal and a statement of account showing the amount as at December 2017. The respondent's defence consisted of mere denials and failed to provide evidence of any outstanding liabilities or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 46 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Master Sammy K. Randu; Respondent: Turtle Bay Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 824 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant.
Judges
M Mwatsama, Gitonga Kamiti, M. Mbeneka
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Withdrawal, Refund of Shares, Account Freezing, Garnishee Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Withdrawal Refund of Shares Account Freezing Garnishee Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Master Sammy K. Randu

Claimant

Turtle Bay Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a refund of his shares from the respondent sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the freezing of the claimant's account was due to mismanagement or other reasons.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant complied with the withdrawal procedures as per the sacco's rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant had proved his entitlement to a refund of Ksh 261,000 by providing a letter of withdrawal and a statement of account showing the amount as at December 2017. The respondent's defence consisted of mere denials and failed to provide evidence of any outstanding liabilities or non-compliance with withdrawal procedures. The tribunal noted that the respondent acknowledged the default judgment and that the garnishee (Co-operative Bank) confirmed holding the funds. The tribunal concluded that the claimant had satisfied the requirements for withdrawal and refund under the sacco's rules and the Co-operative Societies Act. Accordingly, judgment was entered in...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Ksh 261,000.
  • The respondent shall pay costs of the suit to the claimant.