[2024] KEELC 885 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 885 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of leave to apply for judicial review remedies of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against the respondents' decision regarding the impugned land titles. The court exercised its discretion under the Civil Procedure Rules and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 885 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Patrick Awuor Rapemo; Applicant: Sylvester Omondi Awuor & another; Respondent: The Land Registrar, Rachuonyo South And Sub County; Respondent: Sub County Surveyor, Rachuonyo South & 2 others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E004 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Outcome
Leave to apply for judicial review (certiorari, prohibition, mandamus) granted; leave to operate as stay; costs to abide outcome.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Land Title Disputes, Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus
Source Language
en
Land and Property Administrative Law Judicial Review Land Title Disputes Certiorari Prohibition Mandamus

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Awuor Rapemo

Applicant

Sylvester Omondi Awuor & another

Applicant

The Land Registrar, Rachuonyo South And Sub County

Respondent

Sub County Surveyor, Rachuonyo South & 2 others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have established a prima facie case for leave to apply for judicial review remedies of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against the respondents' decision.
  2. 2 Whether the court should grant leave to operate as a stay of the impugned report pending determination of the substantive application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of leave to apply for judicial review remedies of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus against the respondents' decision regarding the impugned land titles. The court exercised its discretion under the Civil Procedure Rules and relevant statutes, considering the interests of justice and constitutional rights. Leave was granted as sought, and the leave was ordered to operate as a stay of the respondents' report pending the hearing and determination of the substantive application. The applicants were directed to file and serve the substantive application within 21 days, with costs to abide the outcome.

Court Disposition

Leave to apply for judicial review (certiorari, prohibition, mandamus) granted; leave to operate as stay; costs to abide outcome.

Orders

  • The application is certified as urgent.
  • Leave to apply for judicial review in the form of certiorari and prohibition is granted as per prayers 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), and 2(d) of the application.