[2021] KEELRC 270 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 270 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had admitted owing the judgment sum and had previously proposed to pay by instalments, but failed to make any payments as promised. The court had already addressed the issue of payment by instalments in its earlier ruling and was therefore functus officio on that matter. There was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 270 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Raphael Njuguna Kuria; Respondent: Seven Seas Technologies Limited; Objector: Metro Credit Limited formerly Bobjane Credit Co. Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E6512 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Applications for Stay of Execution and Payment by Instalments
Outcome
Applications dismissed. Costs to the claimant.
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Payment by Instalments, Judgment on Admission, Execution of Decree
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Stay of Execution Payment by Instalments Judgment on Admission Execution of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Raphael Njuguna Kuria

Claimant

Seven Seas Technologies Limited

Respondent

Metro Credit Limited formerly Bobjane Credit Co. Limited

Objector

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Applications for Stay of Execution and Payment by Instalments

  1. 1 Whether the respondent should be allowed to pay the judgment sum in instalments and be granted a stay of execution.
  2. 2 Whether the court should order Chador Auctioneers to return the motor vehicle registration number KBW 553G to the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had admitted owing the judgment sum and had previously proposed to pay by instalments, but failed to make any payments as promised. The court had already addressed the issue of payment by instalments in its earlier ruling and was therefore functus officio on that matter. There was no valid stay of execution in place, and the execution process was lawful and properly conducted by licensed auctioneers. The respondent did not provide sufficient evidence that the attached property did not belong to them or that they lacked a legal or equitable interest in it. The applications for stay of execution and payment by instalments were thus dismissed, and the...

Court Disposition

Applications dismissed. Costs to the claimant.

Orders

  • Applications dated 15th June, 2021 and 23rd August, 2021 are dismissed.
  • Costs of the applications awarded to the claimant.