[2018] KEHC 1665 (KLR)
The court found that the original trial court record could not be traced despite repeated efforts and correspondence with the Hamisi Law Courts. Without the record, the appellate court is unable to properly hear and determine the appeal, as it cannot review the evidence or proceedings of the trial court. In such...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 1665 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Rashid Angonde Hassan; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 151 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Directions and Disposal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Retrial ordered due to missing trial court record.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Appeal Procedure, Missing Trial Record
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rashid Angonde Hassan
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Directions and Disposal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal can be heard in the absence of the original trial court record.
- 2 What is the appropriate remedy when the trial court record cannot be traced.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the original trial court record could not be traced despite repeated efforts and correspondence with the Hamisi Law Courts. Without the record, the appellate court is unable to properly hear and determine the appeal, as it cannot review the evidence or proceedings of the trial court. In such circumstances, the only viable remedy is to order a retrial to ensure that justice is served and the appellant's right to a fair hearing is preserved. The court therefore ordered that the appellant be retried in proceedings to be conducted at the Hamisi Law Courts.
Court Disposition
Retrial ordered due to missing trial court record.
Orders
- The appellant shall be retried in proceedings to be conducted at the Hamisi Law Courts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 151 OF 2013
BETWEEN
RASHID ANGONDE HASSAN............................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..........................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The petition of appeal herein was lodged at the registry herein on 22nd July 2013, to appeal against a judgment delivered in Hamisi SPMCCRC No. 490 of 2011, wherein the appellant was convicted of the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code, Cap 63, Laws of Kenya. On the same day the Deputy Registrar wrote to the court at Hamisi calling for the original records of the trial court.
2. The application that I am called upon to consider is a Motion dated 25th September 2017. It seeks directions on the disposal of the appeal, and, upon the directions being given, that the appellant be acquitted or otherwise a retrial be ordered. It is averred in the affidavit in support that the records of the trial court had never been availed despite requests that they be made available. There is exhibited a letter from the Hamisi Law Courts dated 10th April 2017 stating that the original records could not be traced.
3. When the matter was placed before me on 26th September 2018 for directions counsel for the state, Mr. Juma, urged me to order a retrial if the original trial court file could not be traced. Mr. Fwaya for the appellant informed that court that he was open to whatever order the court was pleased to make in exercise of its discretion.
4. As the original court record cannot be traced, the appeal herein cannot be heard. In the circumstances, the order that I feel constrained to make is to order that the appellant herein be retried in proceedings to be conducted at the Hamisi Law Courts.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at KAKAMEGA this 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2018
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE