[2013] KEHC 1556 (KLR)
The court found that there was no evidence in the petition of appeal to suggest that the appeal had overwhelming chances of success. The court had not yet heard submissions on the actual appeal, and no exceptional or unusual circumstances were demonstrated. Therefore, the application for bail pending appeal lacked...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1556 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Rashid Mohammed Bulee; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 128 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- BT Jaden
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Robbery With Violence, Judicial Discretion, Exceptional Circumstances
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rashid Mohammed Bulee
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
- 3 Whether exceptional or unusual circumstances exist to justify granting bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no evidence in the petition of appeal to suggest that the appeal had overwhelming chances of success. The court had not yet heard submissions on the actual appeal, and no exceptional or unusual circumstances were demonstrated. Therefore, the application for bail pending appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The appellant's application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 128 OF 2013
RASHID MOHAMMED BULEE ………… ACCUSED/APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC
(Being an appeal from the conviction and sentence of Hon. S.K. Mutai Ag. Principal Magistrate delivered on 31/5/2013 in Mutomo Senior Resident Magistrate Criminal Case No. 56 of 2013)
************************************
(Before Hon. B. Thuranira Jaden J)
R U L I N G
The Appellant/Applicant was on 31/4/2013 convicted for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296 (2) of the Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment.
In an application filed in court on 1/7/2013, the Appellant appealed for both pending the hearing of the appeal.
The application is premised on the grounds that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success. The charge sheet was faulted as being defective and the evidence of the prosecution witnesses termed as inconsistent and contradictory.
It was further argued that the Appellant is an Islamic cleric who is well known in his community and will abide by the terms of bond.
The application was opposed by the State. It was submitted that the appeal has no chances of success and that no special circumstances have been shown to exist. It was further argued that the Appellant has been convicted and may have the incentive to abscond due to the severity of the sentence imposed.
Bail pending appeal is generally a matter of the court’s discretion. There is no Constitutional requirement to grant bail pending appeal. Indeed, the presumption is one of validity of the conviction and sentence imposed. SeeIsaac Tulicha Guyo –vs- Republic (Criminal App. No. 16 of 2010).
The most important consideration in granting the orders sought herein is whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success such that there is no justification of depriving the Applicant his liberty. The court can also consider if there is the existence of any exceptional or unusual circumstances (See Dominic Karanja –vs- Republic 1986 (KLR) 612.
Having carefully considered the facts of this application, I am unable to comment on the claim that the appeal has high chances of success. There is nothing in the petition of appeal that points to the likelihood that the appeal herein is likely to succeed. This court is yet to hear the submissions on the actual appeal. No unusual or exceptional circumstances have been demonstrated to exist in this case.
In the premises therefore, the Appellant’s application has no merits and is dismissed.
B. THURANIRA JADEN
JUDGE
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 8thday of October 2013.
B. THURANIRA JADEN
JUDGE