[2019] KEHC 11674 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11674 (KLR)

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic, the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner for robbery with violence was unconstitutional. The court considered the petitioner's 24 years already served in prison, the absence of loss of life...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 11674 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Rashid Mwinyi Nguisa; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 246 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed; petitioner resentenced and released
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Resentencing, Mandatory Death Sentence, Robbery With Violence, Constitutional Rights, Supreme Court Precedent
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Resentencing Mandatory Death Sentence Robbery With Violence Constitutional Rights Supreme Court Precedent

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rashid Mwinyi Nguisa

Petitioner

Director of Public Prosecution

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing based on the period already served in prison.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another v Republic, the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner for robbery with violence was unconstitutional. The court considered the petitioner's 24 years already served in prison, the absence of loss of life during the offence, and evidence of rehabilitation and reformation. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to resentence the petitioner to 24 years' imprisonment, which he had already served, and ordered his immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.

Court Disposition

petition allowed; petitioner resentenced and released

Orders

  • The petitioner is sentenced to 24 years in jail, deemed already served.
  • The petitioner is forthwith set free and released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held.