[2024] KEHC 14625 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's medical condition, specifically liver cirrhosis with sarcoidosis, constituted exceptional circumstances warranting the grant of bail pending appeal. The medical evidence was unchallenged. The court also noted that the sentence was two years, and there was a likelihood that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 14625 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Charles Ichwara Rasugu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E105 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for bail pending appeal allowed.
- Judges
- TA Odera
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Malicious Damage to Property, Exceptional Circumstances, Sentence Suspension
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Ichwara Rasugu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant's medical condition constitutes exceptional circumstances justifying bail.
- 3 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's medical condition, specifically liver cirrhosis with sarcoidosis, constituted exceptional circumstances warranting the grant of bail pending appeal. The medical evidence was unchallenged. The court also noted that the sentence was two years, and there was a likelihood that the applicant would serve a substantial part of the sentence before the appeal was heard and determined. The court was not in a position to assess the chances of success of the appeal at this stage, as the prosecution had not responded. On the basis of the exceptional medical circumstances and the potential for the applicant to serve a significant portion of the sentence before the...
Court Disposition
Application for bail pending appeal allowed.
Orders
- Applicant admitted to bond of Kshs. 100,000 with surety in the like sum pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
- Record of appeal to be filed and served within 30 days from the date of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Rasugu v Republic (Criminal Appeal E105 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 14625 (KLR) (4 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14625 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisii
Criminal Appeal E105 of 2024
TA Odera, J
November 4, 2024
Between
Charles Ichwara Rasugu
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant filed the application dated 4. 10. 24 seeking:i.………………………………………. spent.ii.That This court be pleased to admit the applicant to bail pending appeal.iii.Any further orders that the court may deed fit to grant.
2. The application is based on the annexed affidavit of Charles Ichwara Rasugu and on the grounds that;a.The applicant is currently serving 2 years sentence upon being convicted in respect of the charge of malicious damage to property contrary to section 339 (1) of the Penal Code.b.The applicant is of ill health suffering from liver cirrhosis with sarcoidosis which gets worse during the cold and rain season for which he requires medical attention while at home.c.It is in the interest of justice that the applicant be admitted to bail to enable him access treatment at home.
3. The applicant deponed that he is suffering a 2-year sentence upon conviction by Hon. Caroline Ocharo – Chief Magistrate on 30. 9.24 on the charges of malicious damage to property contrary to section 339 (1) of the Penal Code as per copy of judgment (“CIR -1’’).
4. Also that he was dissatisfied with the said judgment and he proceeded to file the instant appeal as per notice and memorandum of appeal (“CIR2a and b” respectively).
5. Further that he now seeks bond pending appeal as he is suffering from liver cirrhosis with sarcoidosis whose treatment is not readily available in prison. He annexed the medical report (‘’CIR 3’’).
6. He told this court that he is ready to abide by such terms as this court may deed fit to grant.
7. The prosecution did not oppose the application; however, this court still has a duty to consider the
8. I have carefully considered the application the submissions by the applicant and the law.Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides for bail pending appeal in the High court to wit: - “(1)After entering of an appeal by a person entitled to appeal, the High Court, or the subordinate court which convicted or sentenced that person, may order that he be released on bail with or without sureties, or, if that person is not released on bail, shall at his request order that the execution of the sentence or order appealed against shall be suspended pending the hearing of his appeal’’.
9. The principles for granting bail pending appeal were set out in the case of Jivraj Shah v Republic [1986] eKLR as follows: -a.The existence of exceptional or unusual circumstances upon which a court of appeal can fairly conclude that it is in the interest of justice to grant bail.b.Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.c.Whether there is a likelihood of the appellant having served a substantial part of the sentence by the time of appeal is heard and determined.
10. On whether there are exceptional circumstances upon which this court can conclude that it is in the interest of justice that the applicant be granted bail. The applicant says that he suffers from liver cirrhosis with sarcoidosis as per the medical report which he has annexed to his affidavit. This is not challenged. This is a ground for granting bail.
11. On the chances of appeal, this is a matter of trial as I am yet to see the response by prosecution.On whether there is likelihood that the appellant will have served a substantial part of the sentence by the time the appeal is determined, the sentence is of 2 years and it is clear that by the time the appeal is heard and determined he may have served a substantial part of the sentence.
12. In the upshot, I am satisfied that the applicant has established the grounds for granting bond pending appeal.
13. I grant the applicant bond of Kshs. 100,000/= with surety in the like sum pending hearing and determination of the appeal herein.
14. The Record of appeal be filed and served within 30 days from today. Mention on 27. 1.25 for compliance.
T.A ODERAJUDGE4. 11. 24Delivered virtually in the presence of:Ondima and Mr. Ochoki for the ApplicantKoima for StateCourt Assistant -Oigo