[2007] KEHC 1593 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1593 (KLR)

The court held that since there is a judgment on record, any change of advocates must be sanctioned by leave of the court under Order III, rule 9A of the Civil Procedure Rules. No such leave had been sought or obtained by the applicants' advocates. The court granted the applicants' advocates fourteen days to apply...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 1593 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Razia Iqbal Majothi; Plaintiff: Rosy Y. Majothi; Plaintiff: Halim Majothi; Defendant: Farida Karim; Defendant: Abid Karim
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 20 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Change Advocates and Prosecute Motion
Outcome
Conditional opportunity granted to apply for leave; otherwise, application to be struck out with costs to respondents.
Legal Topics
Change of Advocates, Leave of Court, Irregular Judgment, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Change of Advocates Leave of Court Irregular Judgment Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Razia Iqbal Majothi

Plaintiff

Rosy Y. Majothi

Plaintiff

Halim Majothi

Plaintiff

Farida Karim

Defendant

Abid Karim

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Change Advocates and Prosecute Motion

  1. 1 Whether leave of court is required for a change of advocates after judgment has been entered.
  2. 2 Whether the application by notice of motion dated 18th July, 2007 can be prosecuted without such leave.
  3. 3 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since there is a judgment on record, any change of advocates must be sanctioned by leave of the court under Order III, rule 9A of the Civil Procedure Rules. No such leave had been sought or obtained by the applicants' advocates. The court granted the applicants' advocates fourteen days to apply for the necessary leave; failing which, the application by notice of motion dated 18th July, 2007 would stand struck out with costs to the respondents. The court also awarded costs of the present proceedings to the respondents.

Court Disposition

Conditional opportunity granted to apply for leave; otherwise, application to be struck out with costs to respondents.

Orders

  • Applicants' advocates to apply for leave to come on record within fourteen (14) days of this ruling.
  • If leave is not sought within fourteen (14) days, the application by notice of motion dated 18th July, 2007 shall stand struck out with costs to the respondents.