[2009] KEHC 2088 (KLR)
The court found that Rebecca Kagwiria Joseph failed to disclose all beneficiaries and her proposed distribution was lopsided and inequitable. The court rejected the claim that Christopher Gitonga was entitled to a share of the estate based solely on a certificate of baptism, finding no sufficient evidence of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 2088 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rebecca Kagwiria Joseph; Respondent: Miriam Inokobia Joseph; Respondent: Ruth Kaundu Ungu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause 447 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Grant confirmed with modifications; estate distributed equally among lawful beneficiaries; minors' share held in trust; vacant possession and eviction orders issued as necessary.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Succession and Inheritance, Distribution of Estate, Administration of Estates, Matrimonial Property, Trust for Minors
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rebecca Kagwiria Joseph
Applicant
Miriam Inokobia Joseph
Respondent
Ruth Kaundu Ungu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner disclosed all the beneficiaries of the deceased estate.
- 2 Whether the proposed mode of distribution by the petitioner was equitable.
- 3 Whether Christopher Gitonga was entitled to a share of the deceased estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Rebecca Kagwiria Joseph failed to disclose all beneficiaries and her proposed distribution was lopsided and inequitable. The court rejected the claim that Christopher Gitonga was entitled to a share of the estate based solely on a certificate of baptism, finding no sufficient evidence of maintenance by the deceased. The court held that the estate should be distributed equally among the surviving daughters and the minor children of the deceased daughter, with the minors' share held in trust until they attain majority. The widow, Mariam, was recognized as having priority to the matrimonial home, and her right to occupy it was affirmed. The court ordered vacant...
Court Disposition
Grant confirmed with modifications; estate distributed equally among lawful beneficiaries; minors' share held in trust; vacant possession and eviction orders issued as necessary.
Orders
- Land parcel NJIA/KIEGOI/289 to be divided equally into six portions among Ruth Kaundu Ungu, Rebecca Kagwiria, Julia Kathao, Rael Nkatha Mwanika, Pamela Muthoni Joseph, and the three minors (Tabitha Mukiria, Lydia Gatwiri, Ruth Karambu) with the minors' share held in trust by Ruth Kaundu Ungu until they attain 18 years.
- Each adult beneficiary to receive an equal number of tea bushes on the land.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
44 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
SUCCESSION CAUSE 447 OF 2004
REBECCA KAGWIRIA JOSEPH ……………… PETITONER
VERSUS
MIRIAM INOKOBIA JOSEPH …………………. 1ST OBJECTOR
RUTH KAUNDU UNGU ………………………… 2ND OBJECTOR
JUDGMENT
Rebecca Kagwiria (Rebecca) petitioned for grant of letters of administration in this matter. In so doing she listed who survived the deceased as herself and 3 grand children who included her son Christopher Gitonga (Christopher).
Through an objection that was filed by Mariam Inokobia Joseph (Mariam), the court was informed that the petitioner, Rebecca, had not been candid to the court in stating that those listed in the petition were the only surviving beneficiaries of the deceased. Mariam, who was the wife, of the deceased herein. Rebecca is one of the daughters of the deceased. The deceased also left surviving him the following:-
(i) Ruth Kaundu Ungu – daughter
(ii) Rebecca Kagwiria – daughter
(iii) Julia Kathao – daughter
(iv) Real Nkatha Mwanika – daughter
(v) Beth Karimi – daughter – Deceased survived by:-
a. Tabitha Mukiria – 15 years
b. Lydia Gatwiri – 10 years
c. Ruth Karambu – 8 years
(iv) Pamela Muthoni Joseph – daughter
Mariam, by a certificate of urgency, sought to be restored into her matrimonial home where she said she had been chased by Rebecca and her son Christopher. Mariam set out in her application very disturbing information about the interference and the violence she was experiencing from Rebecca and Christopher. The court in considering her application, delivered a ruling ordering that Mariam be restored into her matrimonial home. The court made the following findings:-
“At the same time, I am persuaded that due to hostilities emanating from the respondent (Rebecca) and her children, the 1st applicant has been forced to move out of her matrimonial home. Strictly speaking, and withoutpreempting the outcome of this cause, the 1st applicant has the priority to inherit the suit property being her matrimonial home. I find that in this application exceptional circumstances exist to justify the grant of a mandatory injunction on an interlocutory application.”
That ruling was not appeal against and that finding therefore still stands. The court proceeded thereafter to appoint the deceased daughters Ruth Karambu and Rebecca Kagwiria and the now deceased widow Mariam as joint administrators. Mariam passed away on 4th May 2009. Accordingly, on 30th June 2009 the court revoked the grant issued and ordered that a fresh one be issued jointly to the names of Ruth and Rebecca. Rebecca filed an affidavit dated 29th April 2009 proposing her mode of distribution of the deceased estate. By that distribution, she allocated land to Christopher on the basis that he had been maintained by the deceased.
The document that was attached to the affidavit as evidence of that maintenance was Christopher’s certificate of baptism. It indicated in the appropriate column that the deceased and Mariam were the parents of Christopher. In my view, that document is not indicative of the deceased maintenance of Christopher. It is not clear under what circumstances the deceased and his wife Mariam were described as parents of Christopher.
On the whole, I have considered the proposed distribution by Rebecca. I find that it is lob sided in favour of Rebecca. It is not equitable. I have considered the distribution suggested by Ruth by her affidavit sworn on 29th June 2009. That mode of distribution is selfless and inequitable. There was no basis made before court why Christopher should share in the distribution of this estate. The judgment of this court is as follows:-
1. That the grant hereof be confirmed in the following terms:-
2. (a) Land parcel No. NJIA/KIEGOI/289 be divided equally into 6 portions
(i) Ruth Kaundu Ungu - 1 portion - whole
(ii) Rebecca Kagwiria – daughter - 1 portion - whole
(iii) Julia Kathao – daughter – 1 portion - whole
(iv) Rael Nkatha Mwanika – daughter 1 portion whole
(a) Tabitha Mukiria-15 yrs one portion equally for all
(b) Ruth Karambu -8yrs of them to be held in trust
(c)Lydia Gatwiri -10 yrs by Ruth Kaundu Ungu
until they all attain the
age of 18.
Pamela Muthoni Joseph – daughter – one portion whole
2. In distribution of parcel NJIA/KIEGOI/289, as stated hereabove, Ruth Kaundu Ungu, Julia Kathao, Rael Nkatha Mwanika, Pamela Muthoni and Rebecca Kagwiria each is to get equal number of tea bushes on that land.
3. Tabitha Mukiria, Lydia Gatwiri and Ruth Karambu, they shall be allocated on Njia/Kiegoi/289 as stated in No. 1 above where the house of Mariam Inokobia Joseph is situated. In that regard, Rebecca Kagwiria and Christopher Gitonga, their servants and agents are ordered to give vacant possession to the said minors of that house within 14 days from this date hereof. In default, an order of eviction of Rebecca Kagwiria and Christopher Gitonga, their servants and agents is to issue forthwith.
4. Rebecca Kagwiria and Christopher Gitonga’s gift intervivos given to them by the deceased will be taken into account in distributing parcel No. 287/KITHIIENE ADJUDICATION UNIT. That parcel of land that is:- 287/KITHIINE ADJUDICATION UNIT shall be distributed to Pamela Muthoni – whole.
5. The court authorizes Ruth Kaunduungu to sign all the necessary documents required to put into effect the judgment of this court.
Dated and delivered at Meru this 23rd day of July 2009.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE