[2024] KEHC 8805 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 8805 (KLR)

The court found that the parties expressly agreed on an exchange rate of Kshs. 104 per USD in their contract, and there was no evidence or allegation of fraud, coercion, or illegality that would justify varying this term. The court emphasized that it is not its function to rewrite contracts or relieve parties from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 8805 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Regal Equipment Ltd; Defendant: Lyna G. Ventures Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 259 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Directions on Applicable Exchange Rate for Decree Enforcement
Outcome
Application allowed to the extent that the agreed contractual exchange rate applies; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
JN Mulwa
Legal Topics
Contractual Exchange Rates, Enforcement of Decrees, Interpretation of Contracts
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Contractual Exchange Rates Enforcement of Decrees Interpretation of Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regal Equipment Ltd

Plaintiff

Lyna G. Ventures Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Directions on Applicable Exchange Rate for Decree Enforcement

  1. 1 Whether the court should direct that the exchange rate agreed in the contract (Kshs. 104 per USD) applies to the outstanding decretal sum.
  2. 2 Whether the court can vary the contractual exchange rate in light of current Central Bank rates.
  3. 3 Whether the parties are bound by the exchange rate stipulated in their agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties expressly agreed on an exchange rate of Kshs. 104 per USD in their contract, and there was no evidence or allegation of fraud, coercion, or illegality that would justify varying this term. The court emphasized that it is not its function to rewrite contracts or relieve parties from bad bargains, and that the sanctity of contract must be upheld. Since the contract and the decree were both denominated in USD and the parties did not provide for a different exchange rate at the time of payment, the court held that the agreed contractual rate must apply to the outstanding decretal sum, including for the purposes of implementing the Deputy Registrar’s ruling....

Court Disposition

Application allowed to the extent that the agreed contractual exchange rate applies; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The applicable exchange rate for enforcement of the decree is Kshs. 104 per USD as agreed in the contract.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.