https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7405

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7405

The applicant showed sufficient cause for the delay because the charge was executed and registered at the Land Registry on time, but release of the original document was delayed by institutional constraints beyond the applicant’s control. No bad faith or prejudice to creditors or shareholders was demonstrated, so...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 7405 (KLR)
Parties
Ex Parte Applicant: ABSS Warehouses Limited; Chargee/interested Party: SBM Bank (Kenya) Limited; Respondent: Registrar of Companies
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 568 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Register Charge
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["MO Ado"]
Legal Topics
Extension of Time for Registration of Charge, Registration of Supplemental Legal Charge, Statutory Compliance Under the Companies Act 2015, Effect of Administrative Delay at the Lands Registry, Whether Failure to Lodge Charge Within 30 Days Was Excusable
Source Language
en
Company Law Commercial Law Banking and Finance Insolvency/secured Transactions Extension of Time for Registration of Charge Registration of Supplemental Legal Charge Statutory Compliance Under the Companies Act 2015 Effect of Administrative Delay at the Lands Registry +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ABSS Warehouses Limited

Ex Parte Applicant

SBM Bank (Kenya) Limited

Chargee/interested Party

Registrar of Companies

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Register Charge

  1. 1 Whether the court should extend time for registration of the supplemental legal charge under sections 878 and 888 of the Companies Act, 2015.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in lodging the charge with the Registrar of Companies was accidental or due to sufficient cause.
  3. 3 Whether extension would prejudice creditors or shareholders.

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant showed sufficient cause for the delay because the charge was executed and registered at the Land Registry on time, but release of the original document was delayed by institutional constraints beyond the applicant’s control. No bad faith or prejudice to creditors or shareholders was demonstrated, so the court exercised its discretion to extend time and regularize the security.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Time for registration of the Supplemental Legal Charge dated 5th December 2025 over Title No. Kericho/Boiywek/476 was extended by thirty (30) days from the date of the ruling.
  • The Registrar of Companies was directed to admit the charge for registration upon presentation and payment of the requisite statutory fees.